JamesRustle
First Grade
- Messages
- 8,049
Should seek an injunction and look to serve his suspension during the international series.
Should seek an injunction and look to serve his suspension during the international series.
Reading the summary transcript, it's clear that Storm's lawyer was a moron, the NRL's was a walking contradiction, and the head of the judiciary was taking the piss with this request: “Finally in terms of the comparable incident you should strive for consistency. If you determine the Holmes tackle was inappropriately graded you should ignore it.”Gyles points out that Collins out of most important game of season and would have missed GF had they made, then points out that a grand final should have no influence on the downgrade.
100%.No player in recent memory has been protected more than this asshole. 5 weeks including a GF is what the man thoroughly deserves given what he has escaped from in his career.
The judiciary has decided Ryles is suspended. He will miss the first five games of next season.Poor Nelson was treated like a Balinese local by the judiciary.
CHT from the Warriors got a sin bin for patting a Bulldogs player on the head. A hit like that deserves a rest on the sidelinesLet’s not forget that Nathan Brown was sent off by Klein for a similar hit that didn’t even knock a bloke out….
Liam Martin got sin binned in state of origin for the same thing.CHT from the Warriors got a sin bin for patting a Bulldogs player on the head. A hit like that deserves a rest on the sidelines
Wouldn’t have mattered if he had OJ’s legal team the judiciary set up is akin to a courtroom in an authoritarian country where guilty verdicts are the expectation. For the record Nick Ghabar was the storm lawyer and this isn’t his first rodeo, he’s like one of the top go to judiciary defence counsel in the NRL and famously got simple Jack Wighton off a shoulder charge all the way back in 2016.Reading the summary transcript, it's clear that Storm's lawyer was a moron, the NRL's was a walking contradiction, and the head of the judiciary was taking the piss with this request: “Finally in terms of the comparable incident you should strive for consistency. If you determine the Holmes tackle was inappropriately graded you should ignore it.”
Yeah, they've made changes here and there over the last few years to pretty much encourage people not to challenge and just take their medicine.Wouldn’t have mattered if he had OJ’s legal team the judiciary set up is akin to a courtroom in an authoritarian country where guilty verdicts are the expectation. For the record Nick Ghabar was the storm lawyer and this isn’t his first rodeo, he’s like one of the top go to judiciary defence counsel in the NRL and famously got simple Jack Wighton off a shoulder charge all the way back in 2016.
The issue is the NRL want the appearance of a fair and impartial trial when it’s just not the case.
Let’s face it, the judiciary is set up so 95% of cases just plead guilty because they know the chances of being acquitted are next to none
What’s silly is you have the MRC that works separately from the rest of the judiciary and hence has no real accountability in the proceedings.Yeah, they've made changes here and there over the last few years to pretty much encourage people not to challenge and just take their medicine.