Lucky this debate isn’t on Twitter he’d have blocked me alreadyYou guys are having one almighty stoush, ill leave you to it. hahaha
Lucky this debate isn’t on Twitter he’d have blocked me alreadyYou guys are having one almighty stoush, ill leave you to it. hahaha
Interesting that you haven't corrected @Wb1234 but busted a gut to correct me ridiculing his blatant bullshit.
It costs about a billion to build a roofed stadium now, let alone 25 years.So what happens in 25 years time when the stadium needs a rebuild ?
Cost will be over a billion to replace it
Maybe the contra from Telstra. Will pay for it
When I was at Uni you either did economics or accounting, I did the former, when they weren`t getting enough students for the former, they introduced business studies, you can also call it commerce, bit of accounting, bit of economics, bit of marketing, the sort of thing you can get at TAFE as well.You're supposed to have a degree in commerce.
There wouldn't be a poster on here that would be against the growth of RL, except you who actively campaigns against it being outside NSW and QLD in AustraliaWith Fox and Kayo it will be well over a million
And people on here question the value of nrl clubs in png and nz2.
In 30. Years time our local rivals will realise their mistake being so insular
There’s also the value of a rugby league World Cup with the nrl developing seven strong southern hemisphere sides (and even helping England too)
Hope it happens soomer as I be in my 80's by then if I last that long.With Fox and Kayo it will be well over a million
And people on here question the value of nrl clubs in png and nz2.
In 30. Years time our local rivals will realise their mistake being so insular
There’s also the value of a rugby league World Cup with the nrl developing seven strong southern hemisphere sides (and even helping England too)
I'll give this question another go. The official ratings blurb says Total TV "is calculated using the audience average for the program as time-coded by the network..."I'm still not completely au fait with the distinction between Reach and Average. The criterion for inclusion in the Reach figure is watching 1 minute. How long does someone have to watch to be counted in the Average figure?
Through the regular season, AFL seem to attract significantly more viewers who watch for a shorter period of time. Are the reasons behind this also part of the explanation for higher finals ratings?
From the limited data available, the Average/Reach ratio for NRLW games is more like AFL than NRL i.e. Average is a smaller proportion of Reach. Appears unaffected by teams, scheduling, closeness of scores, etc.
Sweden’s Kantar Media, which will measure Foxtel Group audiences already measures 7m set top boxes for Sky and SingTel via return path data.
Frain said testing had delivered dramatic results for the Subscription TV broadcaster.
“For example, in August, 49% of half hour time slots were reporting No People, 25-54 audience. The truth the big data reveals is that number is actually 2%. When you count those donuts in terms of audience impacts, Kantar is 84% higher than OzTAM in August alone. Take a look at the first week of Fox Footy in September: the Midweek Tackle +24%, AFL Tonight +40%, AFLW +79%, +38% + 78% +110% and it goes on. That’s a huge impact for the AFLW and for our clients.”
Foxtel Media: "We have attempted many times over the last 2 years to find solutions with OzTAM" | TV Tonight
Foxtel Media CEO kicks off Upfronts by talking about the elephant in the room: ratings.tvtonight.com.au
So instead of 20 000 viewers they got 38 000, big whoop.AFLW +79%, +38% + 78% +110% and it goes on. That’s a huge impact for the AFLW and for our clients.”
So instead of 20 000 viewers they got 38 000, big whoop.
The whole thing looks to me like Foxtel trying to put lipstick on a pig now that`s up it`s for sale.