Vlad59
Juniors
- Messages
- 1,531
Sure is. Smell the fear in perth
Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Sure is. Smell the fear in perth
Plenty of non-Warriors fans living in NZ, many hung onto their team from the pre-Warriors days and some of their kids have since followed
tvtonight.com.au
Nz and Perth please NRL
Can someone plz remind me how reach works ? and how it's different to how many ppl actually watched the game?Thursday 18 April 2024 | TV Tonight
National TV Reach: 1. SEVEN NEWS 2,101,000 2. 9NEWS 1,785,000 3. SEVEN'S AFL 1,561,000 4. THURSDAY NIGHT NRL 1,487,000 5. THE CHASE AUSTRALIA 1,397,000
Looks like great Thursday night ratings for us
Also highlights the nonsense of reach.Thursday 18 April 2024 | TV Tonight
National TV Reach: 1. SEVEN NEWS 2,101,000 2. 9NEWS 1,785,000 3. SEVEN'S AFL 1,561,000 4. THURSDAY NIGHT NRL 1,487,000 5. THE CHASE AUSTRALIA 1,397,000
Looks like great Thursday night ratings for us
www.mediaweek.com.au
Yeah it’s an easy win. Shows the value of a Melbourne v Sydney showdown. Reach is rubbish.
From memory it’s how many people had their television tuned into a show for at least about a minute during its entirety. In other words it’s rubbish
If you watched one minute you are countered
So if you check scores of other sports on say Kayo, you’re counted as a reach viewer?
It’s like Auskick but for afl tv ratings
The funny bit is that until you mentioned it I never knew. I had no idea that the nrl ever used reach data until this moment. And I’ve followed tv ratings from you and others for a long long time. So maybe just take that tin foil afl hat off and don’t lecture us about something we’ve never claimed on this thread. I pride myself on being objective on this thread. So should you.
Don’t drink and post mate. You are better than this
no no no it’s a conspiracy. Afl has managed to convince all tv companies and tv rating companies to change the system so it benefits them. Wb said so. lol
From my limited understanding, you were always deemed a viewer if you watched a single minute. But official ratings were previously calculated as an average of minutes. Reach is an aggregate of all individuals watching one minute. With the obvious consequence that longer programmes are rating higher.
In search of enlightenment, I fearlessly ploughed into the thicket of Bigfumble. One poster draws a distinction between "standalone average" and "cumulative average". Couldn't make sense of his argument. People sometimes conflate the meaning of "cumulative" with "aggregate".
