2025 R16 Fri - Wests Tigers 12-16 Canberra @ Campbelltown

[skeepe]

That's the inconsistency of reffing were dealing with. Consistency would be nice.

Nah, ball-carrying arm never touched the ground. Play on, and would never be penalised.

 

[nick87]

That's the inconsistency of reffing were dealing with. Consistency would be nice.

You want a try disallowed because at some point some idiot ref once incorrectly ruled a pass off the ground that was clearly incorrect?
Id love to know the occasion in which an incident like that resulted in a penalty haha

this is the problem right... like i might take you seriously but you're here earnestly arguing that Kris passed off the ground. Crack head behaviour. Grow up and be better.

 

[sensesmaybenumbed]

You want a try disallowed because at some point some idiot ref once incorrectly ruled a pass off the ground that was clearly incorrect?
Id love to know the occasion in which an incident like that resulted in a penalty haha

this is the problem right... like i might take you seriously but you're here earnestly arguing that Kris passed off the ground. Crack head behaviour. Grow up and be better.

Perhaps the foot in touch from Stuart is a more clear cut wrong call.

 

[nick87]

Perhaps the foot in touch from Stuart is a more clear cut wrong call.

Yes. It would be good if you decided to focus on actual wrong calls instead on f**king insane meth adled bullshit like Kris passed off the ground
Id love that for you

 

[sensesmaybenumbed]

Yes. It would be good if you decided to focus on actual wrong calls instead on f**king insane meth adled bullshit like Kris passed off the ground
Id love that for you

Wow. You're sooking this hard after a win?

I'd hate to see how deranged you'd be if the call that poor went against Canberra.

 

[nick87]

Oh yeah
me the guy who is like "yeah, that Stuart call was bad" is the guy who's sooking
And you, the guy who is crying about Kris passing off the ground which is a figment of your imagination is not sooking

Can you lift, mate? f**k me.

 

[sensesmaybenumbed]

Oh yeah
me the guy who is like "yeah, that Stuart call was bad" is the guy who's sooking
And you, the guy who is crying about Kris passing off the ground which is a figment of your imagination is not sooking

Can you lift, mate? f**k me.

You're not my type, but thanks for the offer.

The ref and touch judge absolutely missed Stuart going into touch. It's highly relevant in that it led to a try for Canberra instead of a 40-20 for Wests. Be as dismissive as you like, but it's still an absolute fact that the officials got it wrong.

 

[BadnMean]

You're not my type, but thanks for the offer.

The ref and touch judge absolutely missed Stuart going into touch. It's highly relevant in that it led to a try for Canberra instead of a 40-20 for Wests. Be as dismissive as you like, but it's still an absolute fact that the officials got it wrong.

Every club gets a couple of those a season. We had one vs the Rorters. And beat the merkins.

You won the infringment count combined 2:1... you reckon you were hard done by then just cry Rick a river. A Rio Grande.

 

[sensesmaybenumbed]

Every club gets a couple of those a season. We had one vs the Rorters. And beat the merkins.

You won the infringment count combined 2:1... you reckon you were hard done by then just cry Rick a river. A Rio Grande.

I'm sure you'd be fine with it if the Raiders lost by 4 points after a decision like that went against them.

 

[nick87]

You're not my type, but thanks for the offer.

The ref and touch judge absolutely missed Stuart going into touch. It's highly relevant in that it led to a try for Canberra instead of a 40-20 for Wests. Be as dismissive as you like, but it's still an absolute fact that the officials got it wrong.

Dismissive?
I literally said it was the wrong call and suggested that if you're going to bitch and cry, you should at least do that about a legitimate gripe like that rather than fabricate some crackhead nonsense like Kris passing off the ground.

Jesus christ, man.

 

[BadnMean]

I'm sure you'd be fine with it if the Raiders lost by 4 points after a decision like that went against them.

This is an epic sook.

You has 57 tackles in our red zone on the back of every restart going, with none flowing back the other way. You stood 2 feet offside every tackle we had in the red. If you were any good this season, you had ample chance to win. Better luck next time, round 25 or so I think.

 

[sensesmaybenumbed]

This is an epic sook.

You has 57 tackles in our red zone on the back of every restart going, with none flowing back the other way. You stood 2 feet offside every tackle we had in the red. If you were any good this season, you had ample chance to win. Better luck next time, round 25 or so I think.

Don't be a hypocrite. You'd be unimpressed if the Raiders copped that call

 

[sensesmaybenumbed]

T

Dismissive?
I literally said it was the wrong call and suggested that if you're going to bitch and cry, you should at least do that about a legitimate gripe like that rather than fabricate some crackhead nonsense like Kris passing off the ground.

Jesus christ, man.

hanks for conceding properly.

 

[BadnMean]

Don't be a hypocrite. You'd be unimpressed if the Raiders copped that call

A decision in about the 10th minute ?? Epic.

 

[sensesmaybenumbed]

A decision in about the 10th minute ?? Epic.

And if the raiders had lost by 4 on the back of a call like that, it's fine, I'm sure.

 

[BadnMean]

And if the raiders had lost by 4 on the back of a call like that, it's fine, I'm sure.

How do you lose on the back of a call in the 10th minute? You just get on with the game.

Last I checked, 40/20's were also worth precisely 4 points less than 4 points. What even is your argument? That you may have scored imaginary points afterward? It'd be a better argument if you hadn't had 4000 other tackles in the red zone and done sweet f all with them. Why would a few more matter? Or maybe you just drop it on the 2nd?

By your own logic, I could go through and find every uncalled set restart, claim it as a guaranteed imaginary 6 points and we wuz robbed of flogging you by 30 points. So there.

 

[sensesmaybenumbed]

How do you lose on the back of a call in the 10th minute? You just get on with the game.

Last I checked, 40/20's were also worth precisely 4 points less than 4 points. What even is your argument? That you may have scored imaginary points afterward? It'd be a better argument if you hadn't had 4000 other tackles in the red zone and done sweet f all with them. Why would a few more matter? Or maybe you just drop it on the 2nd?

By your own logic, I could go through and find every uncalled set restart, claim it as a guaranteed imaginary 6 points and we wuz robbed of flogging you by 30 points. So there.

What you need to understand is that the raiders scored off that set when they were incorrectly awarded the ball. I'm not saying the tigers would have scored, I'm saying the Raiders scored when they shouldn't have had the ball. It's a very simple concept.