some11
Referee
- Messages
- 23,694
Hope so
TAB had a promo, any aussie to ton up $3.50
I put a ten on it, with SMarsh to do it for me
Nice!There it is, brilliant SMarsh
won me $35 too![]()
Hope so
TAB had a promo, any aussie to ton up $3.50
I put a ten on it, with SMarsh to do it for me
Nice!There it is, brilliant SMarsh
won me $35 too![]()
Fine innings by Marsh, well worth his ODI spot unlike a couple of others
WTF is Maxwell doing batting 7? Your selections are just strange
Poor Finchy they just bowl straight and he misses
You went 12 and not 11 to not be racist but I see though itSids to take 7/12
The just need a guy at 8 that can still hold a bat, like the old Faulkner role.
Fair enough,,,Maxwell at 7 is the only thing they've got right, just about....although given the rest of the top order in this side he might be useful higher, 7 is his spot (floating up if needed).
He really is most effective with under 15 overs to go
Then bat Cummins at 9 and Starc at 10. That would be a long batting line up.Someone like Woakes ?
Fair enough,,,
Thought 6 would be better? Guess to me he should be above Stoinis
In the top 7 I only get Marsh Maxwell and Finch, but have they ruined Finch by exposing him in tests?
The just need a guy at 8 that can still hold a bat, like the old Faulkner role.
Its almost like Australia are trying to use Maxwell in the Hussey/Bevan role. He probably could do it if he didnt throw his wicket away so often.Fair enough,,,
Thought 6 would be better? Guess to me he should be above Stoinis
In the top 7 I only get Marsh Maxwell and Finch, but have they ruined Finch by exposing him in tests?