- Messages
- 20,281
2 spinners at the mcg seems reasonable to me
Shhhh they’ll pick Holland if you’re not careful.
2 spinners at the mcg seems reasonable to me
NZ have a 203cm fast bowler and have not been him playing, how the f**k to they expect to get better?
FMD.
Not that bowling is the problem.
Any batters hidden at home?
Nicholls is presumably another option to open - but 3-7 is our strength, messing with that to fix the cluster f**k selection policies just seems double stupid
You've hit the nail on the head though, not having any batting cover (literally none, Blundell is capable but a specialist keeper) is f**king geniused (and some have been saying that for a while) and Santner while a handy cricketer is a limited overs spinner and a spinner in NZ conditions because they don't take wickets - Astle is not a great option - Somerville at least knows Aust, and Patel is the best spin bowler in NZ
But with Ferguson going down, they had the chance to pick a bat and fix the obvious problem - but they're too stupid to... with Boult, Southee and Wagner fit, they all play, no question... Henry is clearly next - Jamieson will be there as a net bowler only - just dumb - bring him over as a net bowler if that's important and add a top order bat FFS
Jesus this is infuriating...
Then again, I see Siddle's been called up, and you have Wade at #5, so guess you can empathize!
Also seems like Larsen (Blundell), Stead (Astle and presumably Raval) and Williamson (Santner) are all playing favouritesOur problem is when we win a few games we bury our head in the sand and scream everything's fine. Can you imagine the Waugh/Ponting Australian teams carrying a batsmen in the form Raval is in just because they are winning? Nope, and that's why they kept winning.
All the bowlers they could pick and they pick Siddle
A Mark Taylor led team wouldOur problem is when we win a few games we bury our head in the sand and scream everything's fine. Can you imagine the Waugh/Ponting Australian teams carrying a batsmen in the form Raval is in just because they are winning? Nope, and that's why they kept winning.
The Haynetrain of Australian cricket. Cockroach.Shittle is a Langer favourite. They have been in love with each other since Langer was batting coach.
I had to sit through a work thing where Langer was the guest speaker. What an absolute dribbling space cadet. He rambled on how much he and Ricky Ponting loved Peter Siddle and what an amazing person he is blah blah blah.
Trevor Hohns tried to axe the Great Steve Waugh’s career and here he is picking an over the hill broken down Plodder. I’ve always disliked him with a passion. He should of f**ked off with Greg Chappell.
Our problem is when we win a few games we bury our head in the sand and scream everything's fine. Can you imagine the Waugh/Ponting Australian teams carrying a batsmen in the form Raval is in just because they are winning?.
I do not understand this at all.
If they want an extra strike bowler to replace Haze, Pattinson.
If they want a workhorse to replace Haze, Neser.
I can’t believe they’re trotting out the ‘he had a good Shield game’ bullshit. Exactly how was Neser supposed to impress in the Shield? He was running the water in Perth?
And if they are just adding a player to the squad because they want two spare quicks, why not Conway or someone else who would benefit from the exposure to the squad?
If they play him it’s a f**king joke.
He's probably as good in England...you mean like they did with Warner after the Ashes?
I know, I know...Raval is not at all as good as Warner. I just couldn’t resist
siddle knows the MCG well and that gives him the edge, apparently. Pattinson would presumably get lost out there
Pattinson in. The MCG pitch is boring enough without Siddle trundling in. Neser doesn't suit the MCG either, he needs a bit in the pitch.
Siddle will get the nod.
Lol indeed... but only because you’ve never played us muchFun Fact: (courtesy of Fox Sports news)
Australia has never beaten NZ in a boxing day test