What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2nd Test: Australia v Pakistan at Abu Dhabi Oct 30-Nov 3, 2014

8Ball

First Grade
Messages
5,132
Australia need to win. Its a more aggressive side. I don't mind the changes given the conditions to be honest.
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,348
Maxwell? Seriously? And just what have the selectors got against O'Keefe?

O'Keefe was hardly fantastic in the first test to be fair. I'm not sold on him. Seems to be a guy that gets a lot of Shield wickets as he is accurate but you need more than accuracy to get test wickets.
 

BunniesMan

Immortal
Messages
33,713
Everyone not named Mitchell Johnson was fodder to a degree.

SOK did enough on debut to keep his spot. If Starc had to replace someone it should have been Siddle.
 
Messages
17,744
Badly need Harris back. Best bowler in Australia, just hope we can get another 2 years or so out of the champion
 

TheParraboy

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
68,415
Everyone not named Mitchell Johnson was fodder to a degree.
SOK did enough on debut to keep his spot. If Starc had to replace someone it should have been Siddle.

The batting let us down a lot, we cant expect our bowlers to rattle sides out all the time around the world. In these conditions we needed to bat real well.

Clarke and Doolan were disgracefull in both innings and a big part of why we couldn't draw the game. let alone go anywhere near winning it
 

8Ball

First Grade
Messages
5,132
Everyone not named Mitchell Johnson was fodder to a degree.

SOK did enough on debut to keep his spot. If Starc had to replace someone it should have been Siddle.

O'Keefe and Lyon were signficantly more expensive. At least Siddle kept the runs down. And before you say the spinners took wickets, they only came after the batsmen were trying to smash them out of the park.
 

BunniesMan

Immortal
Messages
33,713
If we can't get a wicket with Johnsons first spell we're in trouble. Over/under for wickets today is 4.5
 

BunniesMan

Immortal
Messages
33,713
O'Keefe and Lyon were signficantly more expensive. At least Siddle kept the runs down. And before you say the spinners took wickets, they only came after the batsmen were trying to smash them out of the park.

True, I'm not arguing anyone besides Johnson was good enough. But it's a must win test, draw isn't good enough. And to win a test you have to take 20 wickets. I don't think Starc in for SOK helps us get to 20 wickets.
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,348
True, I'm not arguing anyone besides Johnson was good enough. But it's a must win test, draw isn't good enough. And to win a test you have to take 20 wickets. I don't think Starc in for SOK helps us get to 20 wickets.

Ideally you play both. Siddle should have been punted, he was rubbish last test. Starc for Siddle, O'Keefe would play in my side.
 

AlwaysGreen

Post Whore
Messages
50,444
0/29 thus far. It's time for the X factor, boy with the toys, the incrediblely gifted and new Australian number 3 to come on and rout these Pakistanis.

It's Show time.……
 

8Ball

First Grade
Messages
5,132
True, I'm not arguing anyone besides Johnson was good enough. But it's a must win test, draw isn't good enough. And to win a test you have to take 20 wickets. I don't think Starc in for SOK helps us get to 20 wickets.

When it comes down to it, Lyon and O'Keefe (who by his own admission, gets wickets with straight ones) are both defensive spinners. I don't think we need both.
 

Latest posts

Top