What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2nd Test: Australia v South Africa at Adelaide 22-26 Nov

Big Pete

Referee
Messages
29,132
Reminds me of The Simpsons interpretation of soccer.

Fast over-rates, low scoring & draws?! You bet!
 

Xfactor1979

Bench
Messages
2,630
Whatever way you look at it Australia scoring 550 off 110 overs really counts for nothing after all that

I suppose the next step is 540 (6rpo) in a day

But one has to understand - cricket is an English game. The English create games that are designed to be levellers- regardless of how good you are: ie in League: you might be Todd Carney, but you still have to take a hitup, and theres 13 other men between you and the line. and in the case for cricket: Michael Clarke can smash 2 double centuries in consecutive test matches and get no overalll win from either match because his men couldnt bowl the other team out in the allotted time for a score far less than his team's

If you want a game where its all just winning and losing: go watch an American game like baseball, gridiron, basketball or UFC
 

TheParraboy

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
69,402
Whatever way you look at it Australia scoring 550 off 110 overs really counts for nothing after all that

I suppose the next step is 540 (6rpo) in a day

But one has to understand - cricket is an English game. The English create games that are designed to be levellers- regardless of how good you are: ie in League: you might be Todd Carney, but you still have to take a hitup, and theres 13 other men between you and the line. and in the case for cricket: Michael Clarke can smash 2 double centuries in consecutive test matches and get no overalll win from either match because his men couldnt bowl the other team out in the allotted time for a score far less than his team's

If you want a game where its all just winning and losing: go watch an American game like baseball, gridiron, basketball or UFC

Lingerie_Football-League.jpg
 

hineyrulz

Post Whore
Messages
154,889
LMFAO - sweet, go watch 20/20 then
Agreed, today was a war of arrition but this is what test cricket is all about. If watching Siddle pounding in that last few overs when he was on empty did not inspire you Test cricket is not for you.
 

Big Pete

Referee
Messages
29,132
LMFAO - sweet, go watch 20/20 then

Couldn't think of anything worse.

Test cricket is the ultimate form but today's game wasn't it's best advertisement. The format has seen some fantastic games recently and I don't believe this match ranks among those.
 

Hallatia

Referee
Messages
26,433
Agreed, today was a war of arrition but this is what test cricket is all about. If watching Siddle pounding in that last few overs when he was on empty did not inspire you Test cricket is not for you.
this. I really think this match was something else. You couldn't have scripted a contest to pan out this way, but then we had this. The only thing you could predict is that whoever won the toss would bat first. So much happened in each day of the match and a result always seemed certain, it seemed like there was always going to be a winner of this match (I believe that draws are results), but when the odds became stacked too high against South Africa, they pulled something entirely out of left field because they decided that not losing was more important than winning and so this giant stone wall went up and it broke the backs of the Australians. Run fests aren't test cricket. This is test cricket and it is beautiful.

Someone on Twitter suggested these for an Aussie headlines: What the FAF happened? and How the FAF did we lose that?

Faf really played an anti-choke innings in this refusal to lose thing which I love. Even though I wasn't a big fan of the stone wall at first because I wanted South Africa to win
 

Coaster

Bench
Messages
3,162
Did everyone really expect Australia to win these tests?
I cannot believe how well we have played to be in a position to win it.
This team is a shadow of what was, and this attack was always going to struggle to get 20 wickets, yet they are right in this up to there necks.
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
154,199
I tend to agree, how this bunch of nuffies can even get in the situation of challenging for no 1 is beyond me, compare then to our team of about 7 years ago who were on a different level

doesn't say much for the rest of world cricket imo
 

hineyrulz

Post Whore
Messages
154,889
I tend to agree, how this bunch of nuffies can even get in the situation of challenging for no 1 is beyond me, compare then to our team of about 7 years ago who were on a different level

doesn't say much for the rest of world cricket imo
But it does say plenty about the great job Clarke has done since taking over from Ponting.
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
154,199
agreed, Clarkie is carrying the team atm, we just cant get 20 wickets to back him up
 

Xfactor1979

Bench
Messages
2,630
I'm surprised that Peter Siddle didnt hurl the ball in disgust at Morne Morkel for blocking the final ball of the match back at him

and NOBODY, NOBODY TAKES Michael Clarke's MOTM off him, it is what he wants, nobody should get in his way
 

JJ

Immortal
Messages
32,791
agreed, Clarkie is carrying the team atm, we just cant get 20 wickets to back him up

While Clarke has been brilliant, surely part of the reason for that at home is the roads that he's batting on? That also explains the inability of your attack to get 20 wickets... Clarke's career average at home is 65... away 40... doesn't that say something?? Hussey similar at 60 and 42....

and the right player got MoM, no question
 
Last edited:

vvvrulz

Coach
Messages
13,629
I might have agreed with the home/away argument for Clarke if not for that brilliant 150 in South Africa last year.
 

JJ

Immortal
Messages
32,791
I might have agreed with the home/away argument for Clarke if not for that brilliant 150 in South Africa last year.

He's clearly a better play than he was, but has a bit to prove outside Aust, and on pitches offering something to bowlers...

Matthew Sinclair also scored a brilliant 150 in RSA :sarcasm:
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
154,199
While Clarke has been brilliant, surely part of the reason for that at home is the roads that he's batting on? That also explains the inability of your attack to get 20 wickets... Clarke's career average at home is 65... away 40... doesn't that say something?? Hussey similar at 60 and 42....

and the right player got MoM, no question

newsflash

the other 19 batsmen batted on the same pitches, even the saffas, none of them made double tons

Clarke is carrying the team
 

JJ

Immortal
Messages
32,791
newsflash

the other 19 batsmen batted on the same pitches, even the saffas, none of them made double tons

Clarke is carrying the team

Wasn't meant as a dig at Clarke... while others haven't got double tons, plenty have scored runs... Clarke's just in wonderful form - but on your side Cown, Warner, and Hussey have all scored runs too - it's not a one-man show
 

Hutty1986

Immortal
Messages
34,034
He's clearly a better play than he was, but has a bit to prove outside Aust, and on pitches offering something to bowlers...

Matthew Sinclair also scored a brilliant 150 in RSA :sarcasm:

8 hundreds, 11 50's outside of Aus. 151 on debut v India. He's already proven a fair bit..
 

JJ

Immortal
Messages
32,791
averages 40 outside of Aust over a large number of tests... that's decent, but not earth shattering
 

Latest posts

Top