What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2ND TEST: Australia v West Indies Adelaide Oval Dec 4 - Dec 8 2009

aussies1st

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
28,154
Geez that is a dodgy bat, could see some shiny thing on hot spot. Sounded very edgey to me.
 

Hallatia

Referee
Messages
26,433
it sounded edgey, but once they showed it again it really didn't look like he hit it ...
 

TimmyB

Juniors
Messages
2,332
There was definitely a noise, but it didn't sound like the clean noise of a nick. It sounded a little protracted to me. Not only that, the ball didn't deviate and the seam position seemed totally unaffected. There was no way the original decision could be overruled based upon that evidence.

Should it have been given out? Who knows. It immediately sounded out, but the evidence suggests it wasn't a bad decision.
 

yappy

Bench
Messages
4,161
Probably was a small tickle, but with hot spot not showing any lasting mark on the bat it was a fair enough call.

Dougie producing some good heat here. Good spell.
 

aussies1st

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
28,154
I thought Watson was getting some outswing, and that last bowled definitely moved.
 

TimmyB

Juniors
Messages
2,332
Yeah well you can understand why Dougie felt aggrieved.

Benson would have heard whatever the noise was. I wonder how he justified a not out decision?
 

Matt23

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
16,495
Siddle is a pie chucker I can't stand the clown, get rid of him
We'll have to put up with him for at least another 2 years, the current selectors (Fat Merv especially) love him :roll:
 

Fui!!!

Juniors
Messages
996
Hmmm, seems cricket hasn't worked out BotD just yet.

It was to much of a 50/50 call to be given IMO

P.S. not that I care cause Chanderpaul looked set :)
 

Latest posts

Top