Canard
Immortal
- Messages
- 35,958
Ideal top order for mine would be
S Marsh
Warner
Smith
Maxwell
Wade
M Marsh
This guy knows.
Ideal top order for mine would be
S Marsh
Warner
Smith
Maxwell
Wade
M Marsh
Ideal top order for mine would be
S Marsh
Warner
Smith
Maxwell
Wade
M Marsh
And Toys.Needs more levers.
You sir win the internet for today.Mitch Pearce is a better number 7 than Wade
I really like the look of that top 4 for the Aussies going forward.
Renshaw and Warner have that contrast that compliment each other, Smith is class regardless of the situation, and Handscomb has that mix of graft but stil able to rotate the strike and put away the bad ball that can adapt to whatever the situation is.
After that though it turns into a circus.
I reckon Khawaja is a must, but at 4. Yeah some muppets wank on about his limited performances in Asia, but at his best he is an excellent player. Enigmatic, sure, and sometimes he looks lazy but worth carrying given we don't have a lot waiting in the wings.
Handscomb to 5, I really think he's a classic number 4/5 bat and he adds a toughness to the middle of the lineup.
I like Cartwright, I think he deserves a go at the very least.
It's not a champion top 6, but it's certainly capable. And I don't think chopping and changing has helped us at all, all it does it place constant pressure on players to keep their spots and add pressure to the weaker spots in the order. Pick 6 and stick with them, at least for a series or three.
I've always thought Khawaja would be better suited down at 5/6 in tests. His natural instincts are to go after the bowling, but a lot of the time he doesn't look too sure how to go about it. I think sitting back for a bit and coming in with a clear situation in front of him at 5/6 would help him.
Handscomb is sort of like a Waugh hybrid. Gritty, but not as gritty as Steve, fluent/elegant but not as fluent/elegant as Mark. Just somewhere in the middle of the two.
Mitch Pearce is a better number 7 than Wade
I'm stealing that line and claiming it as my own. Take a bow sir.
But I heard Lehmann say this morning he'd 'answered his critics'.
Did he really say that??? What a laughable comment. So he makes a dismissal most keepers would get and it's time to get out the wet wipes. FFS!!! Gee they set the bar for the little plank so low.I'm stealing that line and claiming it as my own. Take a bow sir.
But I heard Lehmann say this morning he'd 'answered his critics'.
Maybe he technically did, but those answers were evasive and meaningless and just raised more questions....