3 2 1 v Cowmob

[Penrose Warrior]

I'm not going to vote because I didn't put myself through the misery of watching...but it'd be a very interesting exercise to see who averages the most votes in losses.

It'd probably still be Ben, given his dominance, but I'd suggest Friend's tally goes up a lot in losses. To me that says he's the one putting in the gutsy efforts week in, week out - we don't notice when we're scoring tries and winning but he's the one consistently digging in when others can't be arsed.

 

[Brando]

I rated Johnson at the start of the year, the way he was so unpredictable and elusive in attack....now he's the most 2 dimensional player out there.

I didn't rate Friend when he started, too old, too predictable and now he is our best player in these dark times.

As for 3 2 1...............who cares!

 

[NZ Warrior]

I didn't even watch the game, so 3 points to me!

 

[Izz]

Guess i'll give a 3,2,1.

3. Friend
2. Mateo
1. Tuimavave

Also thought Ikahihifo tried his guts out, as did Manu. Benry looked okay, too, in the second row. Unsure why Lousi only played 30 minutes.

 

[vvvrulz]

Unsure why Lousi only played 30 minutes.

Because Bluey is running our interchange.

 

[Izz]

Because Bluey is running our interchange.

Running and ruining.

 

[Rich102]

Interesting.

Friend 33
Manu 12
Mateo 12
Tuimavave 4
Rapira, Luck, Ikahihifo, Maloney & Lousi 1 each.


11 voted.

 

[Meth]

Can't believe Maloney got a point.

 

[Rich102]

Can't believe Manu got more than Maloney.

 

[Meth]

Can't believe Manu got more than Maloney.

Can't believe you've figured out how to use the 'puter

 

[Rich102]

That's your best shot? Take some time and have another go.

 

[Meth]

That's your best shot? Take some time and have another go.

LOL.

No, it wasn't my best shot. It wasn't intended to be a shot. More a light hearted jab. You're a good sort Rich.

But I will say 2 things-

#1- I cannot see how anybody in their right might would think that Maloney played better on Saturday night than Manu. On closer inspection, the bloke who gave Maloney a point gave Manu 2, and also confessed to not watching the game. You'd have to have not watched the game to award Maloney a point, and that's exactly what happened.

#2- It always amuses me that whenever you old blokes (you, Ozbash and particularly Skinner) get a 'shot' (perceived only in this case, but however....), the stock standard response from all of you is either a variation of "that's your best shot?" or "you're not worth a response mate". Its so boring.

 

[Rich102]

Fair enough.
Next year will give us a better idea of Maloney's worth.
I haven't heard of any signings that will go close to replacing him.

 

[Meth]

meh. I am not too worried about losing Maloney. I am sure he will benefit from playing in a team that has SBW in it though. Will suit his game (and vice versa)

 

[Blair]

#1- I cannot see how anybody in their right might would think that Maloney played better on Saturday night than Manu. On closer inspection, the bloke who gave Maloney a point gave Manu 2, and also confessed to not watching the game. You'd have to have not watched the game to award Maloney a point, and that's exactly what happened.

That's correct. Maloney got a point for simply being there after I saw him get injured (vs Cronulla) in what seemed like a season ender. He's tough, you have to admit that.

Didn't see the Cowboys game and by all accounts he continued his disappointing form (like most of the team).

 

[Aragorn]

meh. I am not too worried about losing Maloney. I am sure he will benefit from playing in a team that has SBW in it though. Will suit his game (and vice versa)

meh... not too worried about losing Maloney.... meh....plenty more fish in the sea.. ..meh...:lol: