- Messages
- 69,404
Would i be correct in saying Clarkes 100th test match (injuries aside) will be the 2nd ashes test in Adealide in December?
To prove I am capable of criticising Hughes: Both he and Clarke are shitting me by wearing helmets. So stupid in the Indian sun with non stop spin bowling.
He has a century in Sri Lanka.
So does Shaun Darsh lol, and i said against Chuckie you dope.To prove I am capable of criticising Hughes: Both he and Clarke are shitting me by wearing helmets. So stupid in the Indian sun with non stop spin bowling.
He has a century in Sri Lanka.
Seeing as both have batted with baggy greens at times in this series, neither is allergic to it.Who gives a shit if a batsman wants to wear a helmet? Some are used to it. In fact, some prefer it.
Seeing as both have batted with baggy greens at times in this series, neither is allergic to it.
But it adds to body heat. We want both of these blokes batting for a long time. Being agitated by an increase in body heat could lead to either of them to making a silly mistake.
This is a thousand times worse than anything I've ever said in the Cricket section. f**k off and watch something else. Why bother watching if you want us to lose.Meh I hope we lose
Seeing as both have batted with baggy greens at times in this series, neither is allergic to it.
Or doing what SA did in the 2012 Adelaide test. Going nowhere and earning a draw.Australia are doing what England did in the 06 Ashes, Adelaide Test. Digging a hole and choosing to go nowhere is completely pointless.
We had this argument on here over the summer. I'm still confused. To me it seems some umpires judge it differently.Is the no ball determined by whether any part of the foot is behind the line when it lands, or when the heel lands?