Fast Eddie
First Grade
- Messages
- 8,085
Sinclair should have tried to convert himself to an opener this season, then he might have been able to get a crack!
fair call, but it matters more that you make the runs than where they come from and Vettori and McCullum both have averages around 30, so we know they can batfirst inning?? Fine, if you rely on a makeshift #6, your keeper and a tailender to score the bulk of your runs!!
Inverted commas deliberate, and NZ's 'batting' is more than a bit of a concern - it's appalling (only thing worse is Pakistan's fielding)... and I don't exempt Taylor from that either, he's been lucky and his shot selection is schoolboyish
Games evenly poised for tomorrow, Pakis 100 ahead and 6 wickets left. What about Umar Akmar gets of a pair with a 6 :crazy:
Yeah it was great to watch, and then he outlasted the captain :lol:Lot to like about that kid... the talking to Yousuf was giving him after pretty much every ball was hilarious!
Yeah you never know with our batting lineup. Anyone who can bowl over 135 kph usually give us the most trouble and the last 2 times that Pakistan have toured we have had at least 1 major collapse on each of those occasions.could be a fun day...
the Akmal brothers could put a huge amount of pressure on us...
we shouldn't lose, but I get the feeling that with this batting lineup any chase above 70 will be tenuous
he'e better than Hauritz, then again, who isn't
:lol: our media and public are f**king idiots at times. Only NZers would rate Patel. He's sh*t. Vettori will also be treated as some sort of hero by our media for managing to bowl 50 overs with the media wanking on about how courageous he is and how he is NZ cricket :roll:perhaps - they're both about as likely to win you a test on day 4/5... FFS, Vettori seems utterly incapable of spinning NZ to a victory on any sort of wicket
no doubt they'll be saying "we should have played Patel", but I dunno, something like "Vettori should have turned the ball and got more than 1 wicket in 45 overs" doesn't seem unreasonable
I honestly don't see the difference between the 2. Both very average test bowlers if you ask me.he'e better than Hauritz, then again, who isn't