40/30 discuss

[T-Boon]

Discuss

 

[Chief_Chujo]

Nah

 

[T-Boon]

thanks for coming

 

[T-Boon]

Bottom line is it would make the game better.

 

[typicalfan]

Yes 40 is the new 30.

 

[Whip Whitaker]

Needs more line out

 

[Old tiger 79]

His good at it

 

[Old tiger 79]

Sorry phone update is interfering with my text message s

 

[T-Boon]

I thought I opened this in the cave. Could I get a moderator to move it over on the double. Thanks.

 

[Old tiger 79]

I thought I opened this in the cave. Could I get a moderator to move it over on the double. Thanks.

No worries buddy, done

 

[T-Boon]

No worries buddy, done

I hope Carol Baskin eats all your cats.

 

[The_Frog]

The 20/40 was a big hit wasn't it.

It reminds me of breakfast cereals. If someone comes up with one that's popular, they bring out several others with the same name, or very similar. Rugby League is not marketing.

 

[T-Boon]

The 20/40 was a big hit wasn't it.

It reminds me of breakfast cereals. If someone comes up with one that's popular, they bring out several others with the same name. Rugby League is not marketing.

it got made redundant by 6 again. It was never a great idea anyway thats why I've never suggested it.

 

[Marshall_magic]

One and a third

 

[Old tiger 79]

I hope Carol Baskin eats all your cats.

All my big cats will eat your face merkiny.

 

[Captain Apollo]

A 40/20 requires skill to pull off, hence the rewards are commensurate with the effort. A 40/30 would not require quite as much skill and, in my opinion, cheapen the concept as it would just encourage more kicking of the football.

A hard "no thank you" from me.

 

[Whip Whitaker]

A 40/20 requires skill to pull off..

Yeah, the skill of forwards being so garbage that they cannot get out of their own half.

 

[Pommy]

Did you mean discuss or discus?
I could get onboard with a 40/30 discus throw.

 

[T-Boon]

A 40/20 requires skill to pull off, hence the rewards are commensurate with the effort. A 40/30 would not require quite as much skill and, in my opinion, cheapen the concept as it would just encourage more kicking of the football.

A hard "no thank you" from me.

Thanks for a considered answer. I prefer 40/30 to 40/20 because it would require more skill to defend and decisions for the defense to make. Defense is too easy at the moment, they just stand in a straight line 10 across. Defenses should have more to do than that.
Hopefully we would see less bombs as a result.

 

[kit66]

Too easy an out for a team struggling to work the ball out their half and It would penalize good defence.