Is Reiffel drunk?
It wasn’t close… bizarre the bail didn’t move, equally bizarre appeal, and the trifecta with the finger going upI presume he immediately thought pad and discounted the sound being the stump because obviously the bail would have to fall in that case unless Ben Stokes made a literal deal with Satan
Making up for his lack of soul.Stokes looks like he has about nine injuries
Rescind his decision?Bizarre. Stokes with two lives now. Not sure I have ever seen that in a cricket match before with a ball hitting a stump that hard and the bails staying on. Reiffel had no choice but to rescind his decision.
Living on borrowed time and lady luck. He should have technically been out twice already.Good to see the Kiwi restoring some pride for England.
He gave him out LB surely not bowled as the bail had not fallen. When he saw the ball actually hitting the stump without dislodging the bail he had to change his decision to not out. That is how I saw it.Rescind his decision?
what the f**k was his decision? “You should be out so f**k it, piss off”?