4th Ashes Test: England v Australia at Nottingham on Aug 6-10, 2015

[TheParraboy]

Siddle for Starc?

 

[LeedsRhinos]

Time to end this series, if you get the top 3 in the order right now Australia have nothing nobody else can score any runs.

3-1 to the Ingerlund coming up

 

[Timbo]

S.Marsh for Voges, Watson for M.Marsh.

 

[umina panther]

Darsh should never ever be an option

 

[hineyrulz]

Siddle for Starc?

It's not the bowling line up costing us games, the only time our batsman did their jobs we won comfortably.

 

[JW]

If the guts of our order is failing badly against blokes like Finn and Ali, then that's where the bulk of the improvement needs to come from.

Not sold at this stage on playing Johnson and Starc together. Starc in for Harry throws the balance out too much, however, against Ingerlund it really shouldn't be an issue that leads to a series loss. As Hiney said, the issue is the batting. The top order made up for the middle order at Lords and the expected result ensued.

 

[The Charlatan]

Watson should not return under any f**king circumstances.

 

[lockyno1]

It's not the bowling line up costing us games, the only time our batsman did their jobs we won comfortably.

No you are right Starc's pies have been wonderful. Batting has been bad but come on the bowling was awful too, and Starc with his 1 ball in 20 at the stumps is the number 1 culprit.

Lesson to selectors: Stop picking blokes off ODI form!:crazy:

 

[Hutty1986]

Talk of Siddle replacing Hazelwood. Starc's disappointing test career goes on.

 

[WaznTheGreat]

Even a low IQ cheeseburger like me know's that none of the bowlers should be dropped,the batsmen have given this team AIDS.

 

[Red Bear]

Talk of Siddle replacing Hazelwood. Starc's disappointing test career goes on.

We'reconcerned over the runs our bowlers are leaking so we'l drop the guy with the most wickets, best average, economy rate in order to keep playing Starc.

Shouldn't drop either IMO, but stupid thinking to drop Hazlewood.

 

[Haffa]

Hazelwood comes in defending a first innings score under 140 and he's dropped for "leaking runs"? That's the kind of logic which kept Watto in the team 3 years past his used by date.

 

[Haffa]

How about our top and middle order score some runs?!

 

[Twizzle]

Talk of Siddle replacing Hazelwood. Starc's disappointing test career goes on.

by whom ?

 

[Hutty1986]

by whom ?

http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket...lewood-peter-siddle-swap-20150803-giq3dt.html

"Trent Bridge specialist Peter Siddle."

 

[JJ]

:lol: Starc now the allrounder, perhaps...

Gee the kid can bowl at times, but you can't have 2 of your 3 quicks not knowing where the ball will land

Hazelwoood was poor too, but if Siddle (and indeed Marsh and Watson) are your options, then it's not a great squad

 

[simmo1]

All the bowlers should stay.

Even at his worst, Starc will bowl wicket taking deliveries, I'm not sure Siddle will bowl them even at his best.

 

[JJ]

They seem to be awfully worried about conceding quick runs - in that case why not bring back Wazn, and make it clear he has to bowl more overs

 

[Twizzle]

http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket...lewood-peter-siddle-swap-20150803-giq3dt.html

"Trent Bridge specialist Peter Siddle."

no quotes from anyone let alone anyone from CA

clickbait

 

[lockyno1]

All the bowlers should stay.

Even at his worst, Starc will bowl wicket taking deliveries, I'm not sure Siddle will bowl them even at his best.

Yeah Starc does it once or twice a test. Get rid of him he is useless!