Now Clarke is trying to defend the way we batted, saying that the conditions meant we had to bat aggressively.
Jesus Michael, just admit you f**ked up! We did NOT have to bat aggressively there, we had to show patience until the cloud blew over and the deck flattened out!
Time to go Clarke. The weight of runs he scored previously meant we had to put up with comments like this in the past. Just so wildly out of touch.
Healy is blaming the wags. What a f**king joke this is becoming. It's everyone's fault but the players.
Why shouldn't they be there
Khawaja 73 and Burns 63* in the Aus A one dayer. Just throw them straight in the team for the 5th test.
In one day cricket.....for the last time can we not pick players off 50 over form.
Burns is potentially a very good bat but he averaged 28 in County cricket this season (that isn't me saying he shouldn't be in the squad, but he is young)...and Khawaja despite his love in here somehow is VERY limited. Works in Shield cricket but his issues are magnified in test cricket.
Haha. It wasn't an entirely serious comment. But after last nights effort and if the series is lost after this test it probably can't hurt to at least give Burns a go.
Lol wags...really
Lunch day 1
Australia 60
England 0/13
Still 66 more overs in the days play.
Either one of two things will happen
1) England will be all out (albeit will still have a 1st innings lead) and Australia will be batting again before stumps
2) England will be no more than 3 or 4 down with at least a 150 run lead at stumps, in which case we will need to bat at least 150 overs in the 2nd innings for any chance of a draw at the minimum.