If England have outplayed Australia over 5 matches as much as they claim they have, then questions need to be asked of the captaincy. If Stokes has done a great job as captain and Patty has been poor then questions need to be asked of the English talent. Oh and they’ve won 4/5 tosses as well, so it can’t be down to bad luck there either.Australia ahead after 1st innings = England are better. Spell me.
If England have outplayed Australia over 5 matches as much as they claim they have, then questions need to be asked of the captaincy. If Stokes has done a great job as captain and Patty has been poor then questions need to be asked of the English talent. Oh and they’ve won 4/5 tosses as well, so it can’t be down to bad luck there either.
Personally I feel the standard of cricket by both teams has bee pretty poor. A lot of shorter form cricket, getting starts and throwing away your wicket combined with dropped catches everywhere. If one team put a price on their wickets and held their catches they would have comfortably won the series 4 or 5 nil weather permitting.
Pretty much spot on. It's been a very ordinary series that's all about who can fail the least, and that's been us.
The major difference is the Poms are inhaling gigantic canisters of their own farts despite being huge failures, and the Aussies (media, fans etc) are rightly bashing our tactics and performances to death.