Why change something that isn't broken??? He is in the side as a keeper, his excellent counter attacking batting is a bonus. Would he be able to bat as freely up the order.
If Haddin scores a century here would he be close to man of the series? He's seriously saved the batting in every test.
Not at all, find a 3 and put Wazn at 6. But why put your keeper there who is nearly MOTS????Are you trying to say our number 3 batsman doesn't need changing?
He would have to go close
Two man contest between Hads and Super Mitch
He's already my man of the series.
Johnson would have never been in a position to run through them if it wasn't from a series of high-pressure innings from Hadds.
Not at all, find a 3 and put Wazn at 6. But why put your keeper there who is nearly MOTS????
He is in the side to keep not bat, leave him at 7 where his counter attacking batting can cause the opposition the most damage.
Haddin has saved our batting every match. He has effectively given the bowlers something to defend. Johnson is only a prick hair behind him, but Haddin would have to be my pick as well. He's like the Test version of Michael Bevan.