Like them, you carried a few passengers… your top 3, Marsh,LyonWe completely outplayed them in 4 of 5 tests.
Bumrah the only reason they were in any of the games.
Combined team is kind of hard to pick because of the poor batting and lack of spin bowling success. Something like
Jaiswal
Rahul
Smith
Head
Webster (impressive 1 test)
Reddy
Carey
Cummins
Starc
Bumrah
Boland
Jadeja would be the spinner, in for Starc I guess. Siraj not far off Starc, Rahul poor but Australians poorer imo, #3s all horrible etc
We completely outplayed them in 4 of 5 tests.
only decent bats were Jaiswal, Smith, Head, Pant and ReddyCombined team is kind of hard to pick because of the poor batting and lack of spin bowling success. Something like
Jaiswal
Rahul
Smith
Head
Webster (impressive 1 test)
Reddy
Carey
Cummins
Starc
Bumrah
Boland
Jadeja would be the spinner, in for Starc I guess. Siraj not far off Starc, Rahul poor but Australians poorer imo, #3s all horrible etc
agree - The matches were anyones for the taking for most part (similar to the last Ashes in England)no we didn't
Pant and Carey was kind of 50/50 - Pant offers more with the bat, but Carey is tidy.similar to what Fox commentators picked, however they all had Pant over Carey, and Jadeja over Starc
Fair call - I thought Webster was very impressive, and while some argue Konstas had an impact, he wasn't good imo, and it's pretty clear the kid is better than a 20:20 hacker - tbh that disappointed me, I was looking forward to seeing Australia's next big talent and I saw some Bazball bullshit that ultimately did nothing much IMO.only decent bats were Jaiswal, Smith, Head, Pant and Reddy
Discount Webster due to only 1 test
Put in Konstas because he probably had more impact in the 2 matches than any other openers
Jaiswal
Konstas
Smith
Head
Pant
Reddy
Carey
Cummins
Starc
Bumrah
Boland
agree - The matches were anyones for the taking for most part (similar to the last Ashes in England)
People seeing things differently, I guess... ultimately it was 3-1, anything else is just speculationOnly Indian's in consideration are Bumrah, Jaiswal and Reddy. It would have been 4-1 if not for rain, and 5-0 if not for Bumrah.
Great thing for Aust is they won both seriesagree - The matches were anyones for the taking for most part (similar to the last Ashes in England)
yeah - seemed like when it looked like Australia was getting on top they would lose a couple of wickets and India would be back inI thought India won a few sessions in the matches they lost and those were sessions where Bumrah cleaned up
Agree on Konstas - not convinced - seems most of his boundary shots were slogs of some kind and didn't bat for more than half a sessionFair call - I thought Webster was very impressive, and while some argue Konstas had an impact, he wasn't good imo, and it's pretty clear the kid is better than a 20:20 hacker - tbh that disappointed me, I was looking forward to seeing Australia's next big talent and I saw some Bazball bullshit that ultimately did nothing much IMO.
On reflection Pant > Carey - fun series, better team won, but each test was interesting
Think it might be time for Khwaja - but opening the batting is the only thing keeping him inGreat thing for Aust is they won both series
Bad thing is the team looks pretty old... but while the old men keep winning it's hard to squeeze new blood in - Konstsas if he plays properly, Green when fit, and perhaps McSweeney would be good additions - as an outsider looks like time for Khawaja and Lyon to consider retiring, selectors to grow some balls around Labuschange who looks bad, and perhaps Hazelwood should be restricted to the red ball?
Yes we didno we didn't
Think you’ve nailed it thereJaiswal
Rahul
Smith
Head
Pant
Carey
Reddy
Cummins
Starc
Bumrah
Boland
If you look at the stats Rahul scored more runs at a better average than Khawaja, Konstas and Labs.
I'll have Pant as a specialist bat, Carey as the keeper. No room for a spinner which is fair because they had little impact.