Aaron Woods

[The Damo]

And 49 years later, there are still no official reports of man going back to the moon.

You crack me up Frank, you really do.

 

[Bests Golden Boots]

And 49 years later, there are still no official reports of man going back to the moon.

That’s what they want you to believe, it’s all propaganda, someone once told me Cronulla won a premiership, I don’t believe that crap either.

 

[slippery5]

And 49 years later, there are still no official reports of man going back to the moon.

Probably the same reason I wont be going back to the town of 1770 in a Combi with 3 mates, sweet fa there.......

 

[Frank Facer]

That’s what they want you to believe, it’s all propaganda, someone once told me Cronulla won a premiership, I don’t believe that crap either.

I don't know if man ever really went to the moon. If they did, then I don't know if they ever went back there. There certainly hasn't been any reports of them ever going back there.

I have heard that they (man) have space stations on the moon. I have also heard that the moon was already inhabited and they got warned off the moon, that is why they never went back. I have seen reports that when they apparently went to the moon that they were being watched by non human entities. I have heard that they have colonies on Mars. I have heard that the US already has its own non terrestrial space ship fleet, look up Gary McKinnon who hacked the Pentagon and that the US wants to extradite him for it. I have heard that they could not have got through the Van Allen Belt. I have heard that the moon landing was staged in a studio. Joseph FarrelI said that immediately after man landed on the moon, NASA started the rumour that it was done in a studio, due to what they had actually discovered on the moon. I have heard that there would be no wind on the moon for the American Flag to wave in. I have heard that the shadows during the live landing were not possible or were at the wrong angles. I have done a little bit of research on the topic, but not that much. As I said, I don't know and I don't think any of you do either. lol I do know that the astronauts that apparently landed on the moon, when asked, wouldn't swear on the holy bible that they actually did land on the moon.

Werner Von Braun told his assistant Carol Rosin in the 1970's to remember that the last card was the fake alien invasion. He also mentioned that first the Russians were going to be the enemy, then terrorist's would be the enemy, then 3rd world country crazies (rogue nations) would be the next concern and the last card was to be the fake alien invasion.

BTW you could have attended Cronulla's grand final win yourself or watched it live on TV, unless you think they could have faked that too.

 

[ouryears]

And 49 years later, there are still no official reports of man going back to the moon.

I heard on radio on Saturday a scientist say we still do NOT have the technology to even land on the moon today, he said it was fake.

Damn Yankees.

What next, weapons of mass destruction found in Iraq?

Ohhhh, that's right, there were none!

I guess I will leave it to Trump and Putin to come up with the next BS.

 

[ouryears]

I don't know if man ever really went to the moon. If they did, then I don't know if they ever went back there. There certainly hasn't been any reports of them ever going back there.

I have heard that they (man) have space stations on the moon. I have also heard that the moon was already inhabited and they got warned off the moon, that is why they never went back. I have seen reports that when they apparently went to the moon that they were being watched by non human entities. I have heard that they have colonies on Mars. I have heard that the US already has its own non terrestrial space ship fleet, look up Gary McKinnon who hacked the Pentagon and that the US wants to extradite him for it. I have heard that they could not have got through the Van Allen Belt. I have heard that the moon landing was staged in a studio. Joseph FarrelI said that immediately after man landed on the moon, NASA started the rumour that it was done in a studio, due to what they had actually discovered on the moon. I have heard that there would be no wind on the moon for the American Flag to wave in. I have heard that the shadows during the live landing were not possible or were at the wrong angles. I have done a little bit of research on the topic, but not that much. As I said, I don't know and I don't think any of you do either. lol I do know that the astronauts that apparently landed on the moon, when asked, wouldn't swear on the holy bible that they actually did land on the moon.

Werner Von Braun told his assistant Carol Rosin in the 1970's to remember that the last card was the fake alien invasion. He also mentioned that first the Russians were going to be the enemy, then terrorist's would be the enemy, then 3rd world country crazies (rogue nations) would be the next concern and the last card was to be the fake alien invasion.

BTW you could have attended Cronulla's grand final win yourself or watched it live on TV, unless you think they could have faked that too.

The GF could have been a hologram, I could have sworn it was real until I saw the field disappear for about 10 seconds.

There was just a dirt pit there, then the hologram kicked back in.

Scary.

 

[Frank Facer]

The GF could have been a hologram, I could have sworn it was real until I saw the field disappear for about 10 seconds.

There was just a dirt pit there, then the hologram kicked back in.

Scary.

I once had a guy ask me if I was a hologram? I said not that I know of. lol It is probably one of the best questions anyone has ever asked me. lol

 

[Frank Facer]

I heard on radio on Saturday a scientist say we still do NOT have the technology to even land on the moon today, he said it was fake.

Damn Yankees.

What next, weapons of mass destruction found in Iraq?

Ohhhh, that's right, there were none!

I guess I will leave it to Trump and Putin to come up with the next BS.

Find out who are pulling the strings of Trump and Putin and then you will be getting somewhere.

 

[ouryears]

Find out who are pulling the strings of Trump and Putin and then you will be getting somewhere.

The Illuminati.....the masonics...

 

[Frank Facer]

The Illuminati.....the masonics...

keep going, you are working your way up, they control them too. I will give you a tip, they are a protected species, I am not even allowed to tell you who they are. I will give you another tip, the media never talks about their influence and power, neither do politicians.

 

[ouryears]

keep going, you are working your way up, they control them too. I will give you a tip, they are a protected species, I am not even allowed to tell you who they are. I will give you another tip, the media never talks about their influence and power, neither do politicians.

How do they manage to have that much power?
Pure money?

How come no one has ever tried to overthrow them?

Satan's men?

So only one other power can beat them.

Their day of reckoning will come Frank.

 

[BennyV]

A lot of questions I have about a few people on this forum are being answered in this thread!

 

[BennyV]

Of course it’s no way to run a club. I’d be filthy if I was a Dogs fan.

But I’ll say it once again, it’s not up to the NRL to teach clubs to run themselves properly. The Dogs haven’t broken any cap rules even if they have screwed themselves for the next few years.

Hasler had a strategy to win a comp within a given window. It didn’t work, so tough shit. If he had won a comp, he’d be a hero and we wouldn’t even be talking about this.

It’s why there was a cleanout at the Dogs with a new coach and a totally new administration. The Dogs have paid for their lack of foresight.

It is what t is. I’m just glad it’s not us.

If clubs have to offload players in order to become cap compliant, then that is exceeding the cap and the NRL, as the governing body, should not be registering these contracts.

To think that the NRL should not have a hand in running the clubs is short sighted. It's in the NRLs best interest to have a thriving competition with well-run clubs competing on a fairly even playing field in order to deliver the best product for them to attract fans and make money. If that means they need to pull clubs in line or 'teach clubs to run themselves properly' then it damn well should!

I would imagine first priority would be for the NRL to run itself efficiently and professionally though.

 

[giboz71]

If clubs have to offload players in order to become cap compliant, then that is exceeding the cap and the NRL, as the governing body, should not be registering these contracts.

To think that the NRL should not have a hand in running the clubs is short sighted. It's in the NRLs best interest to have a thriving competition with well-run clubs competing on a fairly even playing field in order to deliver the best product for them to attract fans and make money. If that means they need to pull clubs in line or 'teach clubs to run themselves properly' then it damn well should!

I would imagine first priority would be for the NRL to run itself efficiently and professionally though.

Don’t necessarily agree.

There is a salary cap that clubs need to abide by to ensure equity but clubs should have the freedom to manage it as they wish. And if they want to focus on winning a comp today as opposed to 5 years from now, that’s up to them.

Dogs are an example of trying to win a comp within a given window, it was obvious what Hasler was trying to pull off. On the other hand, you have clubs like Penrith and Newcastle with so called 5 year plans that were building up their roster to win in the future.

I don’t have a problem with either strategy as long as everybody stays within the rules.

The Dogs are an extreme example I agree and perhaps the NRL should have intervened to save them from 3 years of pain. But managing your own cap should be the clubs responsibliy and it you balls it up, then it’s on you.

But as I said, if Hasler won a comp within his given window, then I would have tipped my hat off to him. Some would argue it would have been worth the pain they are about to suffer.

 

[The Damo]

keep going, you are working your way up, they control them too. I will give you a tip, they are a protected species, I am not even allowed to tell you who they are. I will give you another tip, the media never talks about their influence and power, neither do politicians.

Ooh I’ve got a guess - does it start with J and rhyme with blues?
Because that’s just a front for the lizard people.

 

[The Damo]

A lot of questions I have about a few people on this forum are being answered in this thread!

We’re through the looking glass here people.

 

[Bests Golden Boots]

Ooh I’ve got a guess - does it start with J and rhyme with blues?
Because that’s just a front for the lizard people.

Idiot, its the Melbourne Storm, they run everything under the Lizard King Cameron Smith, Bellemy is just front man to put a human face on things.

 

[Crush]

Aaron Woods sighted at St George Leagues Club. Lets just hope he like chinese food.

 

[Bests Golden Boots]

Don’t necessarily agree.

There is a salary cap that clubs need to abide by to ensure equity but clubs should have the freedom to manage it as they wish. And if they want to focus on winning a comp today as opposed to 5 years from now, that’s up to them.

Dogs are an example of trying to win a comp within a given window, it was obvious what Hasler was trying to pull off. On the other hand, you have clubs like Penrith and Newcastle with so called 5 year plans that were building up their roster to win in the future.

I don’t have a problem with either strategy as long as everybody stays within the rules.

The Dogs are an extreme example I agree and perhaps the NRL should have intervened to save them from 3 years of pain. But managing your own cap should be the clubs responsibliy and it you balls it up, then it’s on you.

But as I said, if Hasler won a comp within his given window, then I would have tipped my hat off to him. Some would argue it would have been worth the pain they are about to suffer.

But if you go with that logic you come to the situation that every year a team wins the comp only to get it stripped two years later.
My arguement is that by underpaying for players in the first years of their contracts, then over paying later, you are rorting the cap.
It’s like the previous Bulldogs, they had all their points stripped one year, the next year they win the comp with the exact same players, with a team that was artificially underpayed that year.

 

[Bests Golden Boots]

Aaron Woods sighted at St George Leagues Club. Lets just hope he like chinese food.

Only there for the Sizzler, left when he realised it was closed.