Regardless of any other comments about Woods, one thing is for sure, Woods (due to his state and national achievements) won't come cheap. If money is the reason we lost Ah Mau and before him Packer (even Thompson) than we won't match the offers that Woods will attract, IMO.
Actually I take this back. If we had Woods and Vaughan in the rotation, then Lawrie with another year under his belt may be in a position to take up a 4th spot in the prop rotation. In which case, we are in need of depth at prop. Some solid youngsters from other clubs. I’m not convinced Kerr will ever be an option, Sele and Host should be rotation options for lock and second row respectively (and exclusively) and with Graham continuing to get on, we need some back up.
Hell, we need that regardless of who fills the vacancy in our prop rotation.
The mail is that it is a done deal, that Woods is going to CronullaSo, back to the original topic.
If we do pick up Woods, it wouldn't be all doom and gloom. I mean sure.. He's a bit of a marshmallow. But if the Dogs are paying half his wage, it's a pretty solid pick-up for a former Australian rep.
He's a hell of a lot better than Latimore too.
8. Vaughan
9. McInnes
10. Vaughan
11. Frizell
12. Sims
13. De Belin
14. Ah Mau
15. Woods
16. Sele/Host/Leilua
17. Mann
I'd take that.
The mail is that it is a done deal, that Woods is going to Cronulla
The talk on Cronulla's forum is that Woods will be signing with them this week, regardless of if Holmes signs with Nth Qld. They are saying that Holmes to Nth Qld if they can snare Barba this year. I won't be at all surprised if it eventuates.With Holmes off to NQ to free the cap space?
You'd be surprised to know what an xl spreadsheet can do. Small business often do their 5 year business plan on it. I'm sure the NRL could do a 5 year contract plan on it as well. In your example, when entering the salaries for year two, the alarm bells would ring very loud and contracts would not be registered. And even if you did not use such an extreme example, any contract that makes the alarm ring in year two, three or four will not be registered.But they are not registering a contract for a year, they are registering a three year contract.
If you pay 10 players 200 grand the first year, but 800 grand the second, your over the cap for the second, but have an unfair advantage in the first cause you’ve registered players at way under fair market value.
Technically under your cap you could sign the entire Australian team for a $1 in the first year and a million the next, you not going to pay the million next year, but only half cause you’ve moved players on, but you won the title.
That’s an extreme example, but’s ts what we are talking about.
But but but ……. Millward is the super recruiter and is doing an excellent job with our squad. We have a heap of juniors with speed who are not ready for first grade and yes, we have a heap of props who are also not ready or past being able to play first grade. And yes there's more, we are looking after Nightingale who is not up to first grade form and Aitken who is still running in and coming away empty handed. Bring on Bennett asap!Regardless of any other comments about Woods, one thing is for sure, Woods (due to his state and national achievements) won't come cheap. If money is the reason we lost Ah Mau and before him Packer (even Thompson) than we won't match the offers that Woods will attract, IMO.
I have never understood the hype around this bloke. He looks lazy and a plodder. Have I missed something here?Woods was a powder puff at the tigers and now at the doggies. Two coaches have failed to change his play. McIdiot is no chance in making him as good as Vaughan or LAM.
It’s a big no for me. Let me repeat that. NO
Must have missed the real occasions he was 'on' then. Either way it's a no from me. If the money bandied around his worth is credible, I feel a bit nauseous tbh.When he's on, he is on. When he's off, he's really off.
Unfortunately his off/on button sits at about 70/30 or even 80/20.
No you are spot on DQ.I have never understood the hype around this bloke. He looks lazy and a plodder. Have I missed something here?
Well surely we can get a better prop than this for far less $$$. Samy is there anyone is ISP you would promote at this given time? P.s ouryears Foxsports rates Woods at the 4th best prop in the game??No you are spot on DQ.
He is not worth one cent.
Zero, zilch, nothing.
Well surely we can get a better prop than this for far less $$$. Samy is there anyone is ISP you would promote at this given time? P.s ouryears Foxsports rates Woods at the 4th best prop in the game??