Are you sure? I haven’t seen any..The has been a lot of discussion on the forum on who should be our right centre.
I chose Aitken.Just asking if any of the "8" that voted for Atiken could please share your rationale in choosing him above Lomax?
Absolutely love it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I chose Aitken.
My rationale behind choosing him over Lomax is that I knew it would annoy people.
How could you honestly say he is too green for first grade, have you ever seen him play???Reggies this year for Zach. Spot on he absolutely needs game time and is too green for FG at this stage
How could you honestly say he is too green for first grade, have you ever seen him play???
I don't understand your thinking on this. Over the past 3 years whoever was our winger outside Aitken was made to look bad; Nightingale, Macdonald, Lomax for a game. Then look at the stats and see how many try assists Aitken provided to his outside man, then look at Aitkens miss-tackle numbers and the situation is very clear. There are probably no stats on hogging the ball but if there was, Aitken would be leading the charge for centres in the NRL.Ravawala is the problem not Aitken.
Lomax to be our goalkicking winger.
Maybe our dumb coach does realise Lomax is a better centre than Aitken. Sure he should being an ex-international centre.Like Pharlap. And Raddish.If lomax was at club with a decent coach he would be playing every week.
When will our dumb coach recognise what he has.Bloody idiot.
Just asking if any of the "8" that voted for Atiken could please share your rationale in choosing him above Lomax? Its a forum, so you can't be wrong or right, just trying to understand.
Mary is not going to drop EA.I was one of the 8. My rationale is that Aitken has been playing well so far this year. He’s quick, a hard ball runner, and despite what others say, I think he’s a good defender. When he hits he hits hard. He plays the game hard and generates quick play the balls. He does a lot of the little things right in the game. He lacks ball playing ability though.
At the start of the season I probably would have gone with Lomax as the incumbent, who did well replacing Aitken at the end of last season. Lomax is bigger and has some ball playing skill and a bit of a step and fend. He reminds me a bit of Gasnier (perhaps not as quick). He’s a very solid defender and a good goal kicker. Perhaps he lacks a bit of pace.
They are totally different styles of player, so it’s hard to compare them. Eventually I reckon Lomax will demand selection. He’s almost there now and the kid’s 19. He’ll fill out more which I reckon could see him eventually as a 2nd rower, but will play a few seasons at centre, and yes I can see him replacing Aitken soon.
I'll always support the team,However should this eventuate due to L plates arrogance & lack of nurturing talent I'll certainly step back until he is finally moved on.Mary is not going to drop EA.
I don't see a future for him at the club with Mary in change.
CC
Ok then just for me, have a good look for this game. I think you will change your mind.I was one of the 8. My rationale is that Aitken has been playing well so far this year. He’s quick, a hard ball runner, and despite what others say, I think he’s a good defender. When he hits he hits hard. He plays the game hard and generates quick play the balls. He does a lot of the little things right in the game. He lacks ball playing ability though.
At the start of the season I probably would have gone with Lomax as the incumbent, who did well replacing Aitken at the end of last season. Lomax is bigger and has some ball playing skill and a bit of a step and fend. He reminds me a bit of Gasnier (perhaps not as quick). He’s a very solid defender and a good goal kicker. Perhaps he lacks a bit of pace.
They are totally different styles of player, so it’s hard to compare them. Eventually I reckon Lomax will demand selection. He’s almost there now and the kid’s 19. He’ll fill out more which I reckon could see him eventually as a 2nd rower, but will play a few seasons at centre, and yes I can see him replacing Aitken soon.
Time for Mary to make a big change
Star youngster Zac Lomax deserves a starting spot, or at least more game time amid the Dragons’ goal kicking struggles.
Ed Chisholm
CONTRIBUTOR
April 24, 2019 - 9:20 am
Share
SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA - FEBRUARY 17: Head Coach of the Dragons Paul McGregor looks on during the NRL trial match between the St George Illawarra Dragons and Hull at ANZ Stadium on February 17, 2018 in Sydney, Australia. (Photo by Jason McCawley/Getty Images)
A side on a four-game winning streak sitting in the top six is one you wouldn’t tend to change, however Dragons coach Paul McGregor must make a crucial call ahead of a huge Anzac Day test against the league’s top side in the Roosters.
With first choice kicker and captain Gareth Widdop sidelined until at least the finals, the Red V’s kicking duties have fallen to Tim Lafai, whose two games in charge with the tee have resulted in some disastrous kicking which almost cost the side twice.
Luckily for McGregor there’s a quick and easy fix, and he’s already in the starting 17.
Having stepped up for the side in crucial periods of a game in his short NRL career already, the Dragons desperately need star youngster Zac Lomax on the field for as long as possible.
Just seven months ago, Lomax was handed the responsibility of taking a penalty kick in the Dragons’ semi-final against the Rabbitohs which would put the side ahead with only minutes on the clock. The Temora juniour stood over the ball like he could’ve kicked it with his eyes closed and smashed the Steeden through the sticks.
It’s this steal and confidence that must be thrust upon the side in next week’s Anzac Day, in light of the club’s goal kicking conundrum.
Beyond Lomax’s ice cool goal kicking ability he is an out-and-out brilliant player, who in his short NRL career has already proven his freakish ability. Dubbed ‘the gifted one’ by NSW Blues coach Brad Fittler, Lomax is a big body with electric agility and an eye for big plays.
In a game which is almost always won by a matter of points, the Dragons can’t afford to get the small things wrong on Anzac Day against the Roosters.
And with that, Mary has a big decision to make: give Lomax bigger minutes off the bench, or replace one of his current starting 13 with Lomax?
Currently playing in Lomax’s preferred positions of fullback and center are Matt Dufty, Euan Aitken and Tim Lafai, all of whom McGregor is unlikely to move on.
Which means if Lomax comes into the 13, rookie Fijian winger Mikaele Ravalawa seems the most likely to be moved. Whilst he scored the try that won his side the game against Manly, and has shown improvements in his combination with inside centre Euan Aitken, Ravalawa’s defense has still proven to be shakey and he has become a target for high kicks after a number of drops.
https://www.nospam21.com/time-for-mary-to-make-a-big-change-43219/
Brian and Bruce have already spoken with the extension of Mary. There needs to be a shake up.Dare I say these sentiments (now well & truly from beyond the Club) must be getting near 95% traction TBH
Sacrificing so much for a park centre is rapidly becoming farcical
You need to make a call Brian or Bruce?
Ok then just for me, have a good look for this game. I think you will change your mind.
Lomax is never going to look good outside Aitken. They are both contesting the 3 jumper, do you think Aitken is going to give Lomax any ball at all.I will have another look... I’ve watched every game this year and he’s done well. Last season was a mixed bag for Aitken, started well and faded towards the end of the season, but he wasn’t the only one.
I agree that we need Lomax in the side but I’d bring him in for Rav for now.
Lomax is never going to look good outside Aitken. They are both contesting the 3 jumper, do you think Aitken is going to give Lomax any ball at all.