What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Alex McKinnon possibly Quadriplegic - Mclean guilty of dangerous throw - 7 weeks

How many weeks?

  • 1-2

    Votes: 53 42.7%
  • 3-4

    Votes: 25 20.2%
  • 5-6

    Votes: 10 8.1%
  • 7-8

    Votes: 10 8.1%
  • 9+

    Votes: 26 21.0%

  • Total voters
    124
Status
Not open for further replies.

cleary89

Coach
Messages
16,483
While he obviously would have a case, after having $1.1m raised for him and a job for life, I could easily see public opinion starting to turn against him and that job disappearing after a bit.

Injured Newcastle Knights star Alex McKinnon weighing up advice to sue

Alex McKinnon is weighing up legal advice to sue the Melbourne Storm and the NRL following the tackle which left the 23-year-old in a wheelchair.

Fairfax Media has learnt McKinnon has engaged a Sydney-based law firm to explore his rights after the tackle by the Storm's Jordan McLean ended his NRL career prematurely. It is understood the legal advice indicates that McKinnon has a strong potential case for taking action against the Storm and the NRL.

Despite the recommendation, McKinnon is reportedly hesitant to start action as he is mindful of the support he has received from the NRL and the wider rugby league community since the injury. McKinnon did not wish to comment when contacted by Fairfax Media on Wednesday night. It is thought McLean would not be personally liable for the tackle, but his club could come under the microscope. McLean was suspended for seven games for a dangerous throw.

McKinnon's legal team will point to a case involving former Wests Tigers forward Jarrod McCracken, who was awarded $97,000 in 2006 after suing the Melbourne Storm and two players he claimed cut short his career with a spear tackle. In this case, McCracken's career was ended after he injured his neck and spine after a tackle by Stephen Kearney and Marcus Bai.

NSW Supreme Court Justice Robert Hulme said in his judgment: "[The injuries] also prevented him from continuing in a career for which he had a passion and which must have involved substantial satisfaction and reward in addition to that of a monetary nature."

Any potential case could also involve the NRL and explore if the governing body is liable. Questions will be asked if the NRL should have taken a more concerted effort to crack down on lifting tackles, like they have done since McKinnon's injury.

There have been a host of instances where players have sued an opponent because of foul play. Former international Dale Shearer, who was awarded $60,000 by the District Court after his jaw was broken in a high tackle by Eastern Suburbs centre David French during a 1988 game, while Queensland forward Daryl Brohman received about $35,000 after being hit in the jaw by Les Boyd.

NRL supporters donated more than $1.1 million for McKinnon during the fundraising Rise for Alex round last year. The NRL has also offered McKinnon a "job for life". He started a role with the Knights in January. "My role will be mostly football related and working with the juniors, however I hope to also contribute on the commercial side," McKinnon said in January. He suffered two fractured vertebrae when driven head-first into the ground in a three-man tackle in the final seconds of the first half of Newcastle's 28-20 loss to the Storm on March 24 last year.

He spent four weeks in intensive care at the Alfred Hospital in Melbourne before being transferred to a spinal rehabilitation ward at Sydney's Royal North Shore Hospital, where he learned how to operate an electronic wheelchair. In October he relocated to the Gold Coast to begin an intensive program He stood up unaided for the first time in January.

McKinnon represented the Junior Kangaroos and NSW under-20s.

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...eighing-up-advice-to-sue-20150513-gh14oe.html
 

Tommy Smith

Referee
Messages
21,344
I think I'll wait to see how this plays out before I make a judgement.

Every player knows the risk of playing Rugby League. Hell, the risk of playing any contact sport. And the way that the NRL community responded in supporting McKinnon was also magnificent.

So I'd be very surprised if he went down this path. Bearing in mind this is totally different to cases like McCracken, because 1.1m was raised for Alex and the NRL & Knights are helping him immensely.
 
Last edited:
Messages
17,035
Who are we to judge what McKinnon does. He has every right to sue if he so wishes. No doubt after the NRL got wind of this they would have contacted him talk about an out of court deal.
 

Snappy

Coach
Messages
11,844
What happened to him was a horrific accident. League players, like racing drivers for instance, know the dangers of what they do, and accept that risk every time they take the field. I'd be disappointed if he sued.
 

Kiwi

First Grade
Messages
9,471
He has every right to sue, but when the game raises 1.1m for you and has a offered you a job for life you would think that would effect any judgement in terms of restitution and it would certainly cost him any job at with the NRL as promised.

Considering he is 23, has 1.1m already which would have been most likely tax free and then you consider a job for life at probably around 100k a year and suddenly the NRL and it's fans are paying out almost 6mil to McKinnon. If he sues I'll understand, but will most likely be like most and filthy about it.
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
35,614
He is likely permanently disabled for life.

1.1m is nothing in terms of caring for him. Changes to his house, car, constant medical expenses.

To me you can't begrude someone taking every legal opportunity to ensure he has a decent life.

Being destitute and disabled at 50 just because some bogans didn't want you to sue isn't going to be much comfort.
 

cleary89

Coach
Messages
16,483
On bsb this morning they said some bloke at wests broke his neck in the late 70's. They raised 30k for him and put it in a trust fund so he didnt get it as a lump sum. He's still withdrawing it today.

1.1m in a trust fund would probably last a lifetime. Combined with a job for life and the knights/nrl insurance covering his rehab I cant imagine he would ever struggle with money.

If he wants to sue then fair enough. He is entitled to. But he wont be getting any more of my money in this years rise for alex round and im sure most would hold a similar opinion.
 

BranVan3000

Coach
Messages
12,289
Everyone was up in support if him, lifting his spirits. He was making slow strides towards recovery.

But the coverage has dried up, now McKinnon has time to sit and think about his life going forward and if the gains he made last year have stopped progressing I wouldn't be surprised if he is in quite a dark place now
 

nick87

Coach
Messages
12,401
This might sound callus, but if i were the NRL id be telling him any legal action will result in that "job for life" being rescinded. The NRL have done quite a lot for him given the situation, raised a shit load of money which has no doubt helped him do what he needs around his house to make it accessable, given him guaranteed pay packet for life... i mean thats a lot more than most get in work place accidents, and this is a workplace where the players know this is a risk.
As i said at the time, this wasnt even an old school piledriver spear tackle, i still see tackles similar to that almost every week. So the risk is there and it always will be.

if he wants to sue, that's his call but i dont think its reasonable to expect to be able to sue the NRL and still expect to collect a job for life from them in these circumstances
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
35,614
On bsb this morning they said some bloke at wests broke his neck in the late 70's. They raised 30k for him and put it in a trust fund so he didnt get it as a lump sum. He's still withdrawing it today.

1.1m in a trust fund would probably last a lifetime. Combined with a job for life and the knights/nrl insurance covering his rehab I cant imagine he would ever struggle with money.

If he wants to sue then fair enough. He is entitled to. But he wont be getting any more of my money in this years rise for alex round and im sure most would hold a similar opinion.

There is no way 30k in a trust fund in the 70s is enough to live on disabled. That is a falsehood to try to generate some bad will McKinnon's way.

It's shameful that the NRL don't have insurance in place to cover this in the first place.

I can't believe the scummy way people try to tie their donations to dictate people's lives.

If that's the sort of low life you are, stop donating!
 

Incorrect

Coach
Messages
12,706
I tend to agree with Canard on this.

Obviously I have no idea of the in's and out's of what might be motivating this possible course of action for Alex, but I would assume that he may have been given some legal/financial advice indicating that the money already generously raised and the 'job for life' with the Knights/NRL is not going to be enough to sustain his long term welfare and that in order to go some way towards making up any shortfall, legal action against the Strom/NRL may be his best option.

I doubt this has been borne out of any desire to screw anyone over, it's merely about ensuring he has the best chance to live comfortably for the remainder of his handicapped life.
 

BranVan3000

Coach
Messages
12,289
This might sound callus, but if i were the NRL id be telling him any legal action will result in that "job for life" being rescinded. The NRL have done quite a lot for him given the situation, raised a shit load of money which has no doubt helped him do what he needs around his house to make it accessable, given him guaranteed pay packet for life... i mean thats a lot more than most get in work place accidents, and this is a workplace where the players know this is a risk.
As i said at the time, this wasnt even an old school piledriver spear tackle, i still see tackles similar to that almost every week. So the risk is there and it always will be.

if he wants to sue, that's his call but i dont think its reasonable to expect to be able to sue the NRL and still expect to collect a job for life from them in these circumstances

I agree and while the tackle was dangerous the biggest contributing factor was the way Alex bent his neck - which may count against him if it comes to legal action
 

Tommy Smith

Referee
Messages
21,344
I wouldn't place any blame for the incident on McKinnon at all. That's grossly unfair because nobody knows how you'd react in a similar situation when you have 2 or 3 100+ kg defenders manhandling and lifting you in the air.

It was just a very unfortunate incident. And if you were to apportion blame to anyone, the most would go to Jordan McLean. I wouldn't place any blame on the NRL at all. Hence why I don't see how you could sue the game. McLean yes, and maybe the Storm if you can prove their grubby wrestling tactics, but not the NRL.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top