Hound of Dracula
Juniors
- Messages
- 817
I appreciate your comments regarding my posts, and I take no offence to your views. I’m just surprised at their intensity, unless of course, you are the Tradie, Hahaha.He came close enough.
He’s just lucky.
Roofie was terrified jumping for his life so he wouldn’t get bashed in the head with a hammer and killed.
Maybe he wanted a brain injury?
Doesn’t need an eye?
Fractured skull?
Quadriplegic?
Paraplegic?
Vegetable?
Jaw broken up?
Hands up who wants the Amones and their ‘ken attitude living next door?
I’m not having a go at you, I love your posts but these guys are really dangerous.
I’m surprised the Prosecution are taking so long to appeal.
They should have left the court and made straight for the registry.
‘Maybe he wanted a brain injury? Doesn’t need an eye? Fractured skull? Quadriplegic? Paraplegic? Vegetable? Jaw broken up?’ – Maybe, but none of these outcomes eventuated. I’m just saying that, unless you have form, you can’t punish someone for what might have happened the same as if it did happen.
Punishments in the NRL are often harsher when serious injury is sustained, even when there is no intent to injure. A swinging arm or an attempted shoulder charge, with intent, that misses gets bugger all.
If all the hypothetical situations were tangible for all offenses - Example DUI – The prisons would be overflowing with lifers (I am not defending drink driving)
The father has history and deserves all he gets. The son is 21 and has been given an opportunity to follow a different path to his dad. His first step should be to own it and use AFB as a template for the path ahead.
I reckon Junior’s punishment is severe, appropriate, and consistent in the application of the law.
I also do not want him wearing the RED V, similar to AFB after his conviction.