Australian Idol Named

[frank]

does anyone else have a problem with what i've said, with reasons, or not?

I do.

Problem is you're such a f**ken idiot, there's no point explaining my reasons. The only result would be another boring, pointless slanging match.

I'm comfortable in the knowledge that anyone with half a brain on these forums thinks the same way about you that I do.

 

[frank]

ostrified

One question - how does someone go about being ostrified? Is this where you run around with your head stuck in the sand or your own nether regions, totally in denial?

:roll:

:lol:

 

[*Sandy*]

There are no slanging matches with SS. He categorises you as a stalker and then puts you on ignore. :lol: Just like taking the easy option in slamming peoples weight problems, he takes the easy option in calling you all stalkers. :lol:

 

[King of the Hill]

But frank, I am very intelligent. The fact you cant explain yourself reflects poorly on you, and does nothing to diminish the validity of my reasons.

I see your RSPCA banner says you are for all creatures great and small. That no doubt explains why you are FOR >100 kg 16 year old girls. I subscribe to the "keep Australia beautiful" theory and reckon we should dump them in the ocean.

As for the rest of your dull tirade:

I'm comfortable in the knowledge that anyone with half a brain on these forums thinks the same way about you that I do

Youre probably right, the half-brain halfwits are haters, the full brains are fans. Thanks for your concern.

 

[jed]

There are no slanging matches with SS. He categorises you as a stalker and then puts you on ignore. :lol: Just like taking the easy option in slamming peoples weight problems, he takes the easy option in calling you all stalkers. :lol:

I'm always impressed with people that claim to have others on 'ignore', yet still feel compelled to reply to criticism. :lol:

 

[Mighty Tiger]

oh geez, it's another of my stalking haters, the mighty tiger

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Who posted first in this thread again ??? :lol: :lol:

Yet another ill-informed post by SS :roll:

Do you even know what "stalking" means unlike you I wouldn't waste my time following some egitiscal prick around the forums

does anyone else have a problem with what i've said, with reasons, or not?

Do you think I have a problem with what you said ??

And you still havn't answered the question which was

So are you saying Paris Hilton is the ideal role model for woman in this day and age ???

 

[*Sandy*]

There are no slanging matches with SS. He categorises you as a stalker and then puts you on ignore. :lol: Just like taking the easy option in slamming peoples weight problems, he takes the easy option in calling you all stalkers. :lol:

I'm always impressed with people that claim to have others on 'ignore', yet still feel compelled to reply to criticism. :lol:

with:

oh geez, it's another of my stalking haters, [insert forum member's name]

better add [insert forum member's name] to the ignore list and get on with the fun

does anyone else have a problem with what i've said, with reasons, or not?

:lol:

 

[The Colonel]

Anyone got a banjo, a straw hat and four teeth? ;-)

 

[King of the Hill]

The half brain halfwits are lining up to have a shot at the great man!

 

[Mighty Tiger]

But frank, I am very intelligent.

:lol: :lol: That surely has to be joke of the day :lol: :lol:

The fact you cant explain yourself reflects poorly on you, and does nothing to diminish the validity of my reasons.

This coming from a person who avoids answering questions, and then makes accusations about people stalking him when infact they where already talking within this thread before himself, and then says he will put you on ignore :lol: :lol:

Yes you sure do practice what you preach don't you :lol: :lol:

I see your RSPCA banner says you are for all creatures great and small. That no doubt explains why you are FOR >100 kg 16 year old girls. I subscribe to the "keep Australia beautiful" theory and reckon we should dump them in the ocean.

ahhhh I see now the truth comes out - Your advances where rejected by an overweight woman weren’t they, its been the story of your life hasn't it. :lol: :lol:

Oh well 1 thing is clear as you haven’t shown any agenda against overwieght men I guess they approve of your advances

 

[Mighty Tiger]

The half brain halfwits are lining up to have a shot at the great man!

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Who is this great man you speak of ???

 

[*Sandy*]

It's a shame you keep missing shireshark.

 

[The Colonel]

The half brain halfwits are lining up to have a shot at the great man!

Still care to explain how one becomes ostrified? Or is this a shire thing?

 

[jed]

Ostrified is a side-effect from the 6 fingers on the left hand.

 

[frank]

But frank, I am very intelligent. The fact you cant explain yourself reflects poorly on you, and does nothing to diminish the validity of my reasons.

Of course you are. The fact that you don't know where apostrophes belong only diminishes the validity of your egotistical statement further.

I see your RSPCA banner says you are for all creatures great and small. That no doubt explains why you are FOR >100 kg 16 year old girls. I subscribe to the "keep Australia beautiful" theory and reckon we should dump them in the ocean.

I see that your banner says Boycott France. That no doubt explains your petty right-wing intolerance and bigotry.
I'll stick with the RSPCA.

As for the rest of your dull tirade:

I'm comfortable in the knowledge that anyone with half a brain on these forums thinks the same way about you that I do

Youre probably right, the half-brain halfwits are haters, the full brains are fans. Thanks for your concern.

You've got fans?
I seriously doubt that you've got friends.

 

[King of the Hill]

:lol: :lol: fat bastard

 

[dimitri]

Considering she is a 16 year old - I'm sure walking is already included in her daily routine. :lol:

doesnt look like it

 

[Booyah]

her family may not have been able to afford sport activities.

Oh please!

How much does it cost to go for a jog around the park, or swim at the beach?

Last time I looked, absolutely nothing.

Actually some people are not suited for jogging. I hate jogging, I have crappy knee joints due to previous netball injuries. Jogging can be quite damaging on your joints so it may cost you physiotherapy in the end. Besides for jogging to be healthy it must be done regularly - a jog in a park is not going to do it.

To swim you must be taught first and that can amount to more than $10 per child per lesson. Swimming at the beach does not reduce weight.

Plus with the rising statistics with drowning each year it's not a good idea to take your kids to the beach without some sort of beach awareness and to do that it has cost me just over $200 to put 2 of mine through nippers.

Fine then. Jogging and swimming are out.

What about an exercise bike? Every man and his dog throws those out during a council clean up, so if money is tight for them, that's no worries. They can swing by and score one on any street corner.

Perhaps a few aerobic exercises every morning; Sit ups, star jumps and so forth, to kick start the metabolism before she eats a presumably large breakfast.

There are no real reasons why she cannot partake in any physical exercise. She's 16 for godsake. It has nothing to do with cost either, I think it's more to do with laziness then anything else.

 

[Dean Moriarty]

I reckon this could catch on. I always thought Pavarotti could do with getting off his ass and doing some exercise. And he could afford a new exercise bike - no hunting round in the clean-ups for him. :lol:

 

[King of the Hill]

If you cant exercise then fine, dont leave the house at all.

Keep Australia beautiful.