Should we be battlers though? 2 or 3 years ago Southee and Boult consistently got players nicking out. They hit great lengths and swung the ball late. We took our catches too.
Ok, we still had issues. But my main problem is we are sloppy. I am still stunned at our complete inability in the limited overs series not to bowl a truck load of wides. It never seemed to be addressed and it's continued into the tests.
I think the bowling coach is a big issue - the bowlers have obviously regressed, and they're not too old - and presumably Boult's back injury has recovered - although having had a back injury I can understand how it might impact him regardless. And the fielding is terrible, I wonder if Rixon did some sessions with them LOL - I'd have expected that to have been good in this test after the last one
But yeah, I think we are perpetual battlers - aside from the late Hadlee era when he was bizarrely good and we had a very solid supporting cast, we've always been battlers - we typically have one to three world class players, some solid ones and a bunch that shouldn't be anywhere near test cricket - in the present team does anyone seriously believe Nicholls, de Grandhomme and Santner are test cricketers, perhaps Raval too... Australia are pretty much mud by their standards at the moment IMO but you'd only put Wade and Cartwright of their last test teams in that category