Lambretta
First Grade
- Messages
- 8,694
I have first hand knowledge of how the scum reporters and producers at ACA work. My wife was involved in a minor scandal last year and ACA approached her to do an interview. We thought it would be a good idea to get the truth of the incident out in the open. The interview went well and we thought it would be a positive story from our point of view. Anyway when it aired we nearly had a coronary, it seemed ACA had also interviewed the person we were in dispute with and had turned the story into an attack on my wife! They were very selective in editing what she had said in the interview and often cut off her responses before she could fully explain her position on the matter. ACA are corrupt and biased toward making a more SENSATIONAL and CONTROVERSIAL mountain out of a molehill. They have a team who trawl the internet and local news sites for any kind of drama or incident that they can exploit for ratings. :x
Have you never heard the expression "edited for truth"
All media outlets push stories from their own point of view.
There's no such thing as "two sides to every story" unless the opposition on the other channel decide to push that angle.
Remember the Shapelle / Mercedes Corby thing that went to air a year or so ago? You had Channel 7 and Channel 9 apparently telling exactly the same story - one took the side of Mercedes, the other took the point of view that she was scum.
Same story - yet two completely one sided biased reporting making the same people on the one hand saints and on the other sinners.
If you're ever invited to give an interview for anything, do so in the understanding that anything you say may be taken out of context and used against you.