What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Bid names

Status
Not open for further replies.

Matt_CBY

Juniors
Messages
1,971
I think they would have been better to go with Magpies than Tigers but I get it all boils down to marketing, hence why they feel the need to adopt identities that have zero relevance to Australia.
Might want to look into the reasoning behind why Balmain were called the Tigers. A merger was never going to be called the Wests Magpies nor the Balmain Magpies. Makes no sense.
 

Matt_CBY

Juniors
Messages
1,971
It was to show you how little I thought of your side of the argument and if you had anything worthwhile to add.
I haven’t provided an argument . I merely asked a questions of your opinion.


I think you meant ‘What is this supposed to mean?’ Or, alternatively, ‘What does this mean?’
Try again.
Okay grammar Nazi. I’ll be sure to pull you up every time you muck up in this regard. I don’t know when I'll have time to post about anything else though.
 

Matt_CBY

Juniors
Messages
1,971
WRONG. You were the one who said I want want to look into why Balmain became known as the Tigers. i have clearly demonstrated that I knew exactly why this was so. It was a definite air ball from you.
Do you know how to follow a conversation?

Refer to what happened previously in the conversation and don’t try to act like a wanker just because you see a few trolls on here acting like wankers.
 

Vlad59

Bench
Messages
4,269
I haven’t provided an argument . I merely asked a questions of your opinion.



Okay grammar Nazi. I’ll be sure to pull you up every time you muck up in this regard. I don’t know when I'll have time to post about anything else though.
It’s all crap anyway so I’d stop altogether if I were you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top