What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

BIG BASH 24-25 (Mens and Womens)

Wizardman

First Grade
Messages
9,346
The fact that a 20/20 side is still paying a guy like Gilkes for 20/20 cricket is a bit of a head scratcher.

For a team to have any sort of success in this format, every batter (as well as some of the bowlers) have to have the ability to find the rope. Throughout his 20/20 history, Gilkes is just not a boundary hitter. Yes, he can rotate the strike but he does not do much at all to hurt the opposition. I felt the Thunder absolutely missed a trick by not bringing in Green/Sams to do some heavy hitting at the stage of the innings in which Gilkes was brought in. Fortunately for them, it didn't cost them.

As for Tom Andrews, I have some advice for the Thunder. If you HAVE to play him, don't use him for the last over. The vast majority of Bash sides would have taken him down tonight.
 

Iamback

Referee
Messages
20,666
The fact that a 20/20 side is still paying a guy like Gilkes for 20/20 cricket is a bit of a head scratcher.

For a team to have any sort of success in this format, every batter (as well as some of the bowlers) have to have the ability to find the rope. Throughout his 20/20 history, Gilkes is just not a boundary hitter. Yes, he can rotate the strike but he does not do much at all to hurt the opposition. I felt the Thunder absolutely missed a trick by not bringing in Green/Sams to do some heavy hitting at the stage of the innings in which Gilkes was brought in. Fortunately for them, it didn't cost them.

As for Tom Andrews, I have some advice for the Thunder. If you HAVE to play him, don't use him for the last over. The vast majority of Bash sides would have taken him down tonight.

Thunder don't have Sandhu anymore. They need some plodder to get smashed without McAndrew, Andrews is that guy
 

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
103,280
Andrews is plod but with the way it shook out it was absolutely the right call for him to bowl the last set once it got into the final 3 or 4.

See Dan Sams v Lloyd Pope for why you use the better bowlers first to ensure the last over still has plenty to play with...
 
Messages
15,183
The fact that a 20/20 side is still paying a guy like Gilkes for 20/20 cricket is a bit of a head scratcher.

For a team to have any sort of success in this format, every batter (as well as some of the bowlers) have to have the ability to find the rope. Throughout his 20/20 history, Gilkes is just not a boundary hitter. Yes, he can rotate the strike but he does not do much at all to hurt the opposition. I felt the Thunder absolutely missed a trick by not bringing in Green/Sams to do some heavy hitting at the stage of the innings in which Gilkes was brought in. Fortunately for them, it didn't cost them.

As for Tom Andrews, I have some advice for the Thunder. If you HAVE to play him, don't use him for the last over. The vast majority of Bash sides would have taken him down tonight.

To do well in the BBL you need a strong bowling unit and a well drilled batting line up. The Sixers and Scorchers have been the benchmark for both of these over the last 10 years and have jointly dominated the league. The Heat have recently pieced together a strong bowling unit and have started to make a few finals.

Having 1-2 fast scoring batsman and betting on them wins you a few games but when it doesn’t come off (which is fairly frequent) you almost guarantee and L.
 

Latest posts

Top