This thread made my day. Thank you General![]()
Don't thank me man. Thank Kogarah Mental Hospital for letting their patients use computers.
And just for a bit more perspective (based on a pure numbers point of view) here are the number of players bought by all clubs over the last 10 years (2000-2009)
Newcastle - 39
Warriors - 42
Bulldogs - 44
Broncos - 44
Penrith - 46
Raiders - 47
Melbourne - 48
Tigers - 50 (2001-2009)
Roosters - 51
Souths - 55 (Since 2003. 86 if you take their last 10 years in the comp exculding their return year)
Manly - 61 (10 years going back to 1996 to exclude Northern Eagles years)
Dragons - 61
Sharks - 62
Parra - 62
Cowboys - 65
All numbers from http://www.rugbyleagueproject.org
So what were you saying about the Dogs and Roosters LL3? :lol::lol:
And just for a bit more perspective (based on a pure numbers point of view) here are the number of players bought by all clubs over the last 10 years (2000-2009)
Newcastle - 39
Warriors - 42
Bulldogs - 44
Broncos - 44
Penrith - 46
Raiders - 47
Melbourne - 48
Tigers - 50 (2001-2009)
Roosters - 51
Souths - 55 (Since 2003. 86 if you take their last 10 years in the comp exculding their return year)
Manly - 61 (10 years going back to 1996 to exclude Northern Eagles years)
Dragons - 61
Sharks - 62
Parra - 62
Cowboys - 65
All numbers from http://www.rugbyleagueproject.org
So what were you saying about the Dogs and Roosters LL3? :lol::lol:
What about players we brought in for the first merge year that weren't part of either Balmain or Wests, there was few of them, Tezza, Hoppa, McCracken, Seers, I'm sure there was a few more.
post again LL3.....PLEASE
If the formatting was a bit better I'd be able to make better sense of all that. How about you give a link to where you copied and pasted that from. Besides it looks like some of those are players we lost not players we bought.
Now who's fudging numbers? :lol:
It's a Roosters /Dogs love in, funny that !
Looking for grammical errors hmmmmm, saids alot...also tells me u spend alot of time on computers.......not that there's anything wrong with that....i just hope it's those nerdy sites u frequent and not anything u can be arrested for.
"Besides it looks like some of those are players we lost not players we bought" - Hmmmm so i believe to have lost a player you must have BOUGHT him, cause the Dogs sure dont produce any?
VAGANA, Nigel BOUGHT NZ? NORTON, Travis BOUGHT QLD?
Anyway its not about owning, that's just freaky farked up sh*t.
I have grave fears for some of the nerds that post on here.
God help people using the trains if Dogs lose AGAIN.....!!
If there was a stat done over say the last 15-20 years of which club has bought the most players, who would it be?
Last 10 years
Bulldogs - 44 (2000-2009)
Dragons - 61 (2000-2009)
Last 15 years
Bulldogs - 71 (1995-2009)
Dragons - 92 (1994-2009 excluding the merge year 1999)
Last 20 years
Bulldogs - 96 (1990-2009)
Dragons - 120 (1989-2009 excluding the merge year 1999)
Ignorance can be cured, unfortunately stupid is forever.It's a Roosters /Dogs love in, funny that !
Looking for grammical errors hmmmmm, saids alot...also tells me u spend alot of time on computers.......not that there's anything wrong with that....i just hope it's those nerdy sites u frequent and not anything u can be arrested for.
"Besides it looks like some of those are players we lost not players we bought" - Hmmmm so i believe to have lost a player you must have BOUGHT him, cause the Dogs sure dont produce any?
VAGANA, Nigel BOUGHT NZ? NORTON, Travis BOUGHT QLD?
Anyway its not about owning, that's just freaky farked up sh*t.
I have grave fears for some of the nerds that post on here.
God help people using the trains if Dogs lose AGAIN.....!!
It's a Roosters /Dogs love in, funny that !
Looking for grammical errors hmmmmm, saids alot...also tells me u spend alot of time on computers.......not that there's anything wrong with that....i just hope it's those nerdy sites u frequent and not anything u can be arrested for.
"Besides it looks like some of those are players we lost not players we bought" - Hmmmm so i believe to have lost a player you must have BOUGHT him, cause the Dogs sure dont produce any?
VAGANA, Nigel BOUGHT NZ? NORTON, Travis BOUGHT QLD?
Anyway its not about owning, that's just freaky farked up sh*t.
I have grave fears for some of the nerds that post on here.
God help people using the trains if Dogs lose AGAIN.....!!
But it's so entertaining to watch someone flail around so wildly, the total demolition job done on him in this thread is just a bonus, don't ever change LL3, if you're too embarrassed to show your face here just head over to the Dogs forum where you're always good for a laugh.and probably dont log on here again..
:lol: Get destroyed in your argument so attack computer skills lol. Wouldn't expect anything else.
I like how you conveniently ignored this
Just admit you were wrong you piss weak moron.