Well, a couple of comments from the news.com.au comments section, which pretty much sum up what I think about the current situation now:
"sorry, but the bouncer's family are showing their true colours now....it's all about the money!! Seems like now they are exploiting their son's situation- if they are really concerned about any adverse publicity continuing, why sue?? This ensures the spotlight remains on him! It was an honest mistake, they have got an apology-now move on! (& actually I am not sure their son should be working as a bouncer- good on him for getting a job, but I would have thought his suitability for this job, & health and safety issues would make him ineligible for this particular job)"
and
"Not normally a 'Footy Show' watcher I did see that segment and 'Yes ' I thought Mr Stacey had been enjoying himself on the night ,so how the Footy Show Panel should have known otherwise from the impromptu interview I do not know.Whilst I applaud Mr Stacey getting out there and earning a dollar I think the bigger issue is how can a person with his sought of disability be in that position.At the end of the day he is a 'Doorman,Bouncer' what ever you want to call it and he is there to evict people who are misbehaving in the premises so how can he communicate with them in what will always be a stressful ,emotion charged enviroment.If anything the question should be asked under the OH&S banner and the Caxton Hotel should be asked 'How they let the man be on his own with that impediment.The next time his speech causes confusion it may result in tragic consequences"
