Brad Drew

[hrundi99]

The reason you all love it is: a) Fatty's comments, b) confirmation bias, and c) the snowball effect.

Thanks Dr Freud.

Seriously, it's a little rich telling people you don't know why they are thinking something.

 

[Kris_man]

Seriously, it's a little rich telling people you don't know why they are thinking something.

- haha, love the double meaning. was that intentional?

 

[hrundi99]

I think there's some great Raiders players. Unforutnately, most of them have either been given to another club or are in Elliott's bad books. To name names: Lolesi, Payten

Payten was a fat cow who wanted to win the imaginary "who could throw the most impossible offloads" award. He had potential but ultimately didn't really do anything whilst at Canberra. I don't see him exactly carving it up at the moment even though he's done a good job of ditching the excess weight.

Lolesi was decent with the ball in his hands but his defence was weak. He's obviously improved that now, but you simply can't compare the Lolesi of now to the Lolesi of then to prove that management is stupid.

If he was playing this well then, then perhaps Graham or someone else wouldn't have been re-signed.

Apples and oranges.

 

[hrundi99]

Seriously, it's a little rich telling people you don't know why they are thinking something.

- haha, love the double meaning. was that intentional?

Please elaborate...

 

[Kris_man]

1) it's a little rich telling ppl that you don't know why they are thinking something.
2) It's a bit rich, telling ppl you don't know, why they are thinking something.

- but yeah, point taken.

 

[jed]

I think hrundi's punctuation explains his intended meaning.

 

[Kris_man]

I think hrundi's punctuation explains his intended meaning.

I don't think so.

 

[jed]

#-o

 

[hrundi99]

I'll take both points thanks.

 

[Kris_man]

- you can't take both because the first one contradicts the second.

 

[hrundi99]

Ah yes I understand that, but I agree with both points.

I'm retrospectively multi-tasking.

 

[Kris_man]

I'm retrospectively multi-tasking.

#-o

 

[hrundi99]

ie.

The 2nd point was my original intention, but the first point is still valid because you've drawn a conclusion without any detail to back it up.

 

[raiders_lover_18]

what is this an english lesson. #-o

 

[jed]

what is this an english lesson. #-o

Indeed. Just 2 pointers though: (1) You should have a capital letter on "What" as it is the start of a new sentence. (2) The fact that you're posing a question necessitates the use of a question mark.

 

[ball boy]

and you can also change it around to say What's this an English leason?

hey jed this isnt about footy should we get back on topic or what?

 

[jed]

your call ballboy - why don't you make a post about the topic????

 

[ball boy]

Nah she's right jed i just dont want it locked or anything

 

[jed]

lol - it's hardly going to be locked.

 

[ball boy]

but you locked the other one so i was just checking