What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Brett Stewart found not guilty of sexual assault

youngun

Juniors
Messages
148
the lad faces very serious allegations - I wish him well

Yes they are very serious allegations and I hope for OUR GAME that it is all proven as false.

The thing that I can't get over though is that there must have been something that went on. If it was as the girl claims then I hope he gets what is coming to him, as the father of a young daughter this is the sort of S**T that scares me the most and in no way can it be condoned.

So if he is innocent then good luck, but if he isn't then I hope he gets some time away with bubba!!!
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
He sure does.

he reminds me of the kid from Deliverance

0,5001,6519000,00.jpg
banjo.jpg
 

LazyDreamer

Bench
Messages
4,934
I may not be a big city lawyer but I am fairly sure that diminished responsibility only applies to murder cases and not sexual assault cases.

Only thing I can guarantee is that when faced with drunk driving, claiming diminished responsibility coz you're p!ssed doesn't work.
 

skeepe

Immortal
Messages
48,225
Brett Stewart ordered to stand trial
BELLINDA KONTOMINAS
March 22, 2010 - 12:40PM

NRL star Brett Stewart has been committed to stand trial over the alleged sexual assault of a 17-year-old neighbour.

Deputy Chief Magistrate Paul Cloran in the Downing Centre Local Court found today that there was enough evidence in the case for a jury to decide Stewart’s guilt or innocence.

Asked by the magistrate if he wanted to say anything in his defence, Stewart replied: "I have nothing to say in my defence."

The matter will be heard again in the NSW District Court on April 9.

The girl's father, who claims she was sexually assaulted by Stewart, has denied lying about the allegations.

Under cross-examination during the committal hearing today, the man said his daughter had come home and told him a man had "touched" her.

When he confronted Stewart, the Manly fullback said: "I didn't touch her, bro ... I live here, bro."

The man admitted to the court he had convictions for fraud dating between 1995 and 2001 for which he served three years' jail, but said it had nothing to do with the allegations against Stewart.

"That is who I was then. That's not who I am now," he said. "That's got nothing to do with what happened to [my daughter] or what your client did to [her]."

The man told the court he has changed his name because he and his family had "lived in hell" since the alleged incident with Stewart occurred.

The man said that, during the confrontation with Stewart, the player's girlfriend Jaime Baker had emerged from his house and said "not again" while pointing to his trousers and his belt, which was undone.

"That little bit that you have just added, that's a pack of lies isn't it?" Stewart's counsel, Clive Steirn, SC, asked.

"I'm not here to lie," the man replied.

Stewart arrived at court hobbling on crutches following a knee injury during Manly's first-round match against Wests Tigers.

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...art-ordered-to-stand-trial-20100322-qpo7.html
 

Latest posts

Top