because we were indecisive and non-commital.Oh sorry I'll rephrase myself.
Why'd we let him go? Jeez who knows where we would have came this year...
Then again I think maybe Aku wouldn't have had the season he had if BSmith was still here. I can see some positives and realisitcally if the Roosters don't win the final, in the end its the same result as us.
Does Stone have a future do you guys think?
because we were indecisive and non-commital.
because we were indecisive and non-commital.
Had we not farted around with reasonably insulting 1 year offers and provided him with some security the roosters would have been unlikely to even get a look-in in the first place. We didn't do the right thing by Smith, for whatever reason, and it bit us hard on the arse.+ the Roosters had 10x the cattle we had
Yeah makes alot of us angry huh.
I remember reading an article about Liverpool Football Club (in the English Premier League) where it outlined why the club was in turmoil. It really demonstrated the influence owners and club administration has on the club.
How the writer used to believe when he was a young boy that the players decided who would win the league. When he got a little older he understood the importance of the manager. However now as a 50 something year old he firmly believes success on the field is determined by the roots planted by the owners of the club etc etc.
Definately applies to us as well if you ask me.
Had we not farted around with reasonably insulting 1 year offers and provided him with some security the roosters would have been unlikely to even get a look-in in the first place. We didn't do the right thing by Smith, for whatever reason, and it bit us hard on the arse.
oh certainly, once he put his feelers out, we had no chance.Oh I agree mate
Cant deny that the superior playing roster and $$$ at the Rooters didnt play a significant part either though
it bit us hard on the arse.