What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

BRL - Boring Rugby League

Southernsaint

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
20,228
A great article from Roy Masters:

http://www.leaguehq.com.au/news/news/leagues-lost-heart/2007/06/21/1182019279927.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1

Some close matches and a few upsets have added interest to the NRL this year. Yet fans feel the game has lost its flair. Matches are dominated by one-out running and defence. There are only a couple of champion players left. Bad decisions break fans' hearts and loyalty is a distant memory. Roy Masters kicks off a Herald series on these issues.

The NRL is a rambling 16-room house painted beige. Judging by the NRL's bizarre bomb-shaped logo, the code's official colours are black, white, green and yellow but they may as well be changed to a dull shade of brown, such is the lack of colour among the clubs.
Parramatta fans wave blue and gold banners and Manly supporters wear maroon and white, but on the field these two great enemies of the early 1980s are as different as Trinidad and Tobago.

Parity has produced uniformity.
The salary cap and mid-season transfers have created a landscape like Garrison Keillor's 1997 novel, Wobegon Boy, where all the kids in the fictional lakeside US town are above average.
OK, maybe not all the NRL's 16 teams are above average, but the salary ceiling and players swapping clubs before June 30 has created a competition where all clubs are clustering to a mean.

Of the nine mid-season transfers, second-rower Clint Newton's switch to Melbourne from Newcastle offers the best example of this levelling process.
Newton's move gave an opportunity to Mitchell Sargent to progress from the bench to a starting position with the Knights.
Sargent previously played for the Cowboys, who he joined after being a benchman at Melbourne.
In other words, Melbourne acquired a player whose position is now filled - two clubs later - by a player Melbourne released.
The same merry-go-round has occurred with coaches, with half of them having been at another club the previous year.
Fans are loyal and so are players and coaches but only in the way a cow is loyal to lucerne.

The NRL might as well issue everyone with black blazers with its bomb-shaped logo on the pocket and allow an executive search team to place players according to a computer that produces eight golden-point results each weekend. The NRL's new commercial partners - Betfair and Tabcorp - would certainly be happy with the unpredictability of each round.
With all the colour bleached from the game it's no wonder Paul Oliver's documentary, The Fibros and the Silvertails, has become the hit of the Sydney Film Festival. It was the first to sell out and required a second session.

The 55-minute film features vision and interviews with Western Suburbs and Manly players from 1978, the first year of the bitter Fibro-Silvertail war.
Players from the Sea Eagles and Magpies speak passionately about their clubs, 30 years after they had literally bled for their teams.
It will be shown on ABC TV either during this year's semi-finals or in the code's centenary season in 2008.
Wests Tigers coach Tim Sheens attended the premiere and witnessed the passion on the screen and in the audience.
Sheens is one of the few NRL coaches conscious of history and has even taken his team to the now almost-abandoned Lidcombe Oval, showing them the dressing room with its battered lockers where all the pre-match motivation took place.
He could not have missed that some of the audience on Tuesday night were wearing hand-knitted jumpers adorned with three-decades-old club logos. No wonder retro jerseys are big sellers.

Revitalising now obscure brands, such as Dux Heaters and Paramount shirts, mightn't please modern marketers but they reflect a time when fans identified with the kid down the road who played with the local juniors and then progressed through the grades to complete his career with the one club.
Of course, there was great disparity in this era - with the rich clubs plundering the poor - yet everyone still spoke about it being a short distance from the penthouse to the basement.

Now, the NRL is a sprawling one-level house with 16 rooms of equal size and it's the same distance from the bathroom to the bedroom as it is from the kitchen to the laundry.
We still get seasons where a club goes from worst to first within seven months, such as Wests Tigers and the Panthers. But what happens the following season?
They jump on the descending escalator, which seems to be travelling faster than the one going up. It's almost as if all the passion in winning a premiership has drained out by the following January.

Nothing demonstrates the bleaching of joy, expression and individual differences more than the case of St George Illawarra five-eighth Richie Williams.
Ahead of the Dragons-Roosters round-seven clash, Williams made a comment about his opposite number, Braith Anasta, that most believed was true: Anasta was not as good as when he first represented the Bulldogs.
For his crime, Williams was bashed on the field, bagged by his coach and banished to premier league for five weeks until injury forced his recall.
But the NRL Thought Police weren't finished - he has now been released to Penrith.
Interestingly, the best chance the NRL has to change its sterile landscape lies not with an outspoken player.

There are signs Roosters chairman Nick Politis and Rabbitohs co-owner Russell Crowe are locked in a private war, luring players off each other and spoiling planned announcements by posting defections on club websites.
It's unlikely this battle between millionaires for dominance of the inner-city will have all the emotion of the Fibro-Silvertail war but it might produce some good colour if they actually say something on the record.
In the meantime, we must live with black and white results in a world dappled with greys.
 

Dragon

Coach
Messages
14,977
Yeah Roy, lets go back to the 90's where we knew what teams would make the top 5 at the end of round 1.......

For christ sake a couple of seasons ago people were crying out for a closer comp. Just look at the table, Roosters, Panthers, Bulldogs and Dragons all at the bottom with teams like the Eagles, Tigers and Titans at the top. Its great for rugby league. It seems each team will spend 1 or two seasons at the top then rebuild to make another shot at the title. I think Roy is making a fuss over nothing, mid season transfers arent that bad, get a grip.
 

coolumsharkie

Referee
Messages
27,115
Certainly the paradox to a closer competition is close low scoring games.

Whether it's dull is a matter of opinion.
 

Titanic

First Grade
Messages
5,935
Roy Masters - ex teacher, ex coach, wannabe philosopher. Fibro/Silvertails should be good viewing though, although it will feature one R Masters - shameless self-promotion.
 

HevyDevy

Coach
Messages
17,146
Roy isn't the only one worried about the game - anyone read what Matt Elliott said in Big League this week?
 

hybrid_tiger

Coach
Messages
11,684
BroncoBuck said:
I agree with his conclusions but his arguments were weak. Long on metaphors short on evidence.

Agreed.

IMO there are only a couple of good teams in this comp, and not many of them are entertaining to watch.
 

Tom Shines

First Grade
Messages
9,854
Players changing clubs is not a bad thing.
I do worry about the effect of the salary cap on the game though.
 

bula_stormer

Juniors
Messages
511
From the moment you learn how to play footy your taught to hold that ball not to throw that pass in your own half, hold the ball in 2 hands etc etc
Few players do otherwise usually the special players, some are told something else and then the skill is coached out of them and then they become robots.
 

KeepingTheFaith

Referee
Messages
25,235
I'd be more inclined to blame the coaches who all seem intent on the same safety-first mistake-free gameplan. Sure some class players are gone, but there's still enough there if they were allowed more freedom.
 

forward pass

Coach
Messages
10,209
He is spot on. The game is pretty ordinary these days - when compared to how it used to be.

How many other team sports do you know of where there is basically no contest for the ball?? Think about it - Rugby, AFL, Soccer, Basketball, Hockey, NFL etc.

How many tries have you seen dead set butchered in the last few weeks? That shows the skill factor is way down.

And there is way too much emphasis on stats.
Personally, I couldn't give a toss who made the most hitups or most metres. I have watched matches in the last few weeks where the game is in the balance with only minutes to go and the side trailling has taken 4 hitups. wtf is that??? Pass the ball for Christs sake !! (SOO was a classic example)

I would love to see a comparison on how many passes are thrown in a match now compared to 10 years ago. I reckon it would be half as many !!!
 

The Engineers Room

First Grade
Messages
8,945
There is still alot of flair. It is just with the dominant tackle and offside rules changed teams go one out just to make it down the ground. I'm a fan of making the team without the ball wait until the ball clears the ruck to move and making a rule that teams must transfer (kick or pass) the ball once, if the play the ball is outside their own 20m or they lose possession.
 

Tom Shines

First Grade
Messages
9,854
forward pass said:
How many other team sports do you know of where there is basically no contest for the ball?? Think about it - Rugby, AFL, Soccer, Basketball, Hockey, NFL etc.!!!
Baseball, cricket, snooker, tennis, squash, softball...
 

dubby

Bench
Messages
3,005
Roy has tried to be poetic and reliant on the "good ol days" thought and his article comes across as sentimental rather than objective.

But that is the point.

I dont expect anyone in here under the age of maybe 23 to understand.


The game today is vastly different to the game from any other era. Is it any better? Well, that question is bound to be answered subjectively as an objective answer cannot be given.

IMO, the game is in a state of decline, determined by the way its played. It is barely Rugby League anymore. It is evolving into another species altogether, and I think alot of people over the age of 30 would agree.

It is time to make a few changes.

Its time to breed footballers, not athletes.

It is time to run out players who play in their specialised positions, not clones who can play in fullback or hooker.

It is time to enforce rules that matter, and not be shouted down because of it. Its time to make rules clear and not gray (play the ball)

Its time to shorten the 10 to a 7.

It is time to make the scrum relevant.

It is time to enforce or establish a system where players can move around within a time frame.

The game is becoming boring IMHO.
 

russ13

First Grade
Messages
6,824
For those that believe the 'contest for possession' line being worthwhile in itself would have liked the recent union test between Australia & Fiji.


Well into the game Australia had 85% of the ball. So the acknowledged best attacking team in the union world had something like 5 minutes (ball in play time) to do something with the ball - what a waste.


So you have paid good money to see Mat Dunning & his type with the ball & the team with the attacking team flair doing all the tackling: no thankyou.


Let me watch Mat Bowen with the ball in-hand rather than Mat Dunning. :lol:




BTW I'll think you will find American & Canadian Football has a some sort of possession gaurantee in their rules.
 

Latest posts

Top