El Diablo
Post Whore
- Messages
- 94,107
even Thwans fans think it's wrong http://www.redandwhiteonline.com/forum/showthread.php/42782-NO-DICKHEADSwORKS FOR sEVEN And the board of an aFL club.
Nope. No repercussions whatsoever.
even Thwans fans think it's wrong http://www.redandwhiteonline.com/forum/showthread.php/42782-NO-DICKHEADSwORKS FOR sEVEN And the board of an aFL club.
Nope. No repercussions whatsoever.
What about a third scenario?Yep. Pretty much.
Abso-f**king-lutely champion!Are you saying this is the girl that Bryce had the bust-up with?
Facebook. And other social media. Obviously the Telegraph are not going to disclose her identity, even though they are quite happy to publish pictures of Cartwright's current partner, who is in no way whatsoever involved in this,in swimwear. Makes a mockery of Kent and Rothfield's bluster about respecting women, no?
What about a third scenario?
3. Guy wants to have the baby, woman does not. Man gets no say and must live with the woman's decision. So effectively, the man really has zero say. The womans is the final say (blah blah her body etc).
Hows that sit?
Bring out the burdizzo clamp!!Bryce Castrateright
Or figured $50k would keep his mistake in cheating on girlfriend quiet.... cheap to keep a clean image.She appears to work as a TV sports presenter.
Yeah but Bryce appears to have accepted that it was his when making his agreement.
Yes you meer kin.The blah blah etc is exactly the point why it's this way you dope
Will this thread be shit canned like the M. Pearce one? That was a classic thread.Anyone who names the young lady involved based on rumor and innuendo from social media will have the post deleted and quite probably face a ban as well.
The fact that she's been named as "Miss x" in the telegraph should give you a clue as to why we won't name her here.
You have been warned.
Wow a profound point. Fellas cant overrule a chick on what she wants to do with her body. No shitYes you meer kin.
I understand that.
The point making is, the males desires are irrelevant in these situations.
Even if he wants to keep it, and she says no then shit out of luck.
merkin.
What about a third scenario?
3. Guy wants to have the baby, woman does not. Man gets no say and must live with the woman's decision. So effectively, the man really has zero say. The womans is the final say (blah blah her body etc).
Hows that sit?
Wow a profound point. Fellas cant overrule a chick on what she wants to do with her body.
What about a third scenario?
3. Guy wants to have the baby, woman does not. Man gets no say and must live with the woman's decision. So effectively, the man really has zero say. The womans is the final say (blah blah her body etc).
Hows that sit?
Will this thread be shit canned like the M. Pearce one? That was a classic thread.
OK with me too as long as a bloke isn't forced to pay her if he'd prefer she got out the coat hangerThe ultimate decision rests with the woman. It sits with me just fine.