Parraren
Bench
- Messages
- 4,100
Sluggish start successfully avoided. I'd call it comatose. Maybe we're working our way up to sluggish?
:lol:
Sluggish start successfully avoided. I'd call it comatose. Maybe we're working our way up to sluggish?
I can't believe you of all people is saying this stuff.
Have you not lived the last 10 years of the Eels?
We have the talent.
We have the playing roster.
We have the coach.
We have the administration.
We started last year the same, and many others.
I'm shocked people are being so pessimistic so early in the season.
This years playing roster is the best we've had for years.
Have faith people.
Suity
No chance of suprising souths... We have no structure or direction what so ever.
There is some serious talent in our backline that will sit there wasted with our current 9,7,6 options.
Our forwards are easy pickings with one out football, oppostion can put the numbers in the tackles without any fear at all.
When is campese going to be penalised for pushing people back over onto their back to slow down the play the ball?
Campese should have been penalised! I called it before that bullsh*t! He's been doing it all night.
Reminds me of a Billy Birmingham skit. Clearly it was a vicious headbutt from Campese to the elbow of poor Joel ReddyI am so glad someone else mentioned Campese. The things he was getting away with out there. He must be sweet talking the refs because they didn't penalise him (I think) at all.
Every tackle he would make he would be working the player, niggling, grabbing an arm etc,
I was so glad that when KK picked him up and dumped him.
Campese is a dirty player. :x
Imagine what he must he up to if a player as clean as Reddy resorts to elbowing him in the face....wish he did he a bit harder to get his money's worth.
Ref should have penalises Campese for pulling back Reddy's arm after the tackle has been made.
Honestly Pete I think if Canberra were in Sydney they'd be in exactly the same position we are. That is 2 from 5 is nowhere near good enough. They have a bigger, quick, more aggressive pack than we do, they may not have the names in the backline but that doesn't mean they don't have the talent. The only difference is they have a better 6,7 & 9 than we do, alright maybe not McCrone but he was in the winner's circle last night. Raiders without doubt in terms of playing rosters should be up the pointy end. If they were the Sydney Raiders they would have just as many if not more questions asked of themI don't know if you are having a shot at me or not..BUT you are not wrong..they (the Raiders) are a good side and should have beaten Wests Tigers last week after having them well and truly by the nuts coming on to half time.
AND with Joel Monaghan David Milne, Travis Waddell and Justin Carney on the way back from injury...Drury Low, Mick Picker waiting in the wings the Raiders have a good future, especially next season.. if not a contender in 2010..
Might be time to get Mate back to 5/8, Morts isn't working his kicking game is pretty bad atm
The most glaring, obvious difference from late 09 to the first five rounds this year is the piss poor go forward by the pack. It all starts from there. I know Hindmarsh is a legend and makes 40 tackles a week etc but his ball running is terrible. I'm not blaming him for the lack of roll on but that is an example of what is being dished up at the moment when carting the ball up and bending the line. It's non-existent.
We have the talent.
We have the playing roster.
We have the coach.
We have the administration.
We started last year the same, and many others.
I'm shocked people are being so pessimistic so early in the season.
This years playing roster is the best we've had for years.
Have faith people.
Honestly Pete I think if Canberra were in Sydney they'd be in exactly the same position we are. That is 2 from 5 is nowhere near good enough. They have a bigger, quick, more aggressive pack than we do, they may not have the names in the backline but that doesn't mean they don't have the talent. The only difference is they have a better 6,7 & 9 than we do, alright maybe not McCrone but he was in the winner's circle last night. Raiders without doubt in terms of playing rosters should be up the pointy end. If they were the Sydney Raiders they would have just as many if not more questions asked of them
I meant they should be contenders right now. If they were in the Sydney market, the media would be printing 50 articles a week about them rather than us. And if I were a Canberra fan I'd only be slightly less p!ssed them I actually am at the moment being an Eels fanSorry, I can't follow what you mean.
The Raiders are 2 from 5..I think they should be 3 from 5 at least, and I think they will get better as this season goes on. They have good depth, and to be beaten by them is not a disgrace. They are well coached with many OUTSTANDING young players in the backline. Kids who are just realising how good they can be, like Dugan, Vidot, Stuart, Joel, Fensom and Croker. Waddel is super, and Mick Picker (NYC) has huge wraps on him as does Drury Low.
They have 'the killer' in them and Quentin Pongia has them fit.
Campo is the ring master and Alan Tongue the inspiration.....This season is a learning curve for them, but, in my opinion, in 2011 they will be contenders.