Perth Red
Post Whore
- Messages
- 67,101
Where are these whispers coming from?
presumably Gallop, though not exactly whispers.
Where are these whispers coming from?
Strongly disagree re pt 1!!
Re crowd averages, you also have to factor in away attendances - how many will Bris2 or Ipswich bring to all NSW away games??? 100?
Bears will bring 5,000+. Closer to 8,000 for big games. Prob 10,000 v Manly or Newcastle away. Plus with Bluetongue a stakeholder our fee structure will be much lower than Suncorp and breakeven crowd figures miniscule....good luck averaging 30K for another SEQ side, which they will need to do.
TV ratings you may be right, but there wouldn't be much in it, given the Bears profile over 100+ years.
good argument, i will pull figures out of my ass and say that SEQ II will bring 25,000 away to broncos and 15,000 away to titans, to every sydney team they will bring 20,000, go on, prove me wrong! :roll:
so de we know the make up of the ownership model yet? So far there seems to be Singleton,Sayer (presuming he isn't broke) and North Sydney Bears all owning a piece. Will there be some level of public ownership as well?
What's happening with the Sayer investment? Is it just for X% of shares or does it include sponsorship rights as well?
The ludicrous thing here is that, in any honest well-run sport, the CC Bears would have been in operation now for over 10 years. Yet - rugby league, with all its agendas, self-serving "executives" and factions, has managed to exclude the Bears for over 10 years. This includes the News ownership of the game as provided by those self-serving cowards in the 90's.
Instead, we have the Dolphin/Titans - supported by a highly questionable "centre of excellence" financial model - given the nod due to nepotism AND now struggling to survive in a tough market - as expected.
Every year, new pathetic excuses are dredged up to prevent the Central Coast Bears inclusion:
1. It's really a Sydney team;
2. there are not enough decent players in the NRL to justify it;
3. It doesn't add much to the TV rights deal.
To me, the reasons are pretty clear for the exclusion - the NRL/News has been waiting out the Bears, hoping they'll give up, so that another Sydney club will relocate - probably Manly or Cronulla.
Manly still have a strong faction wanting to relocate to Gosford. the latest Brookvale "design" discussions highlight what a turd of a ground this really is.
Cronulla have been a dead club walking for decades. the NRL have saved them several times over the years - and selling out to Murdoch has bought them a few more years. The "development" touted for decades as their saviour will not deliver the funds needed to survive. So - no doubt News would have liked them to relocate to Gosford to avoid paying an extra grant for new team.
The CC Bears deserve to get in - but when the game has a fundamental lack of integrity and so many unprofessional executives, there are still no guarantees.
My figures come straight from the CC Bears bid team who are estimating 5-8K for Sydney away games. You might not like what you read, but who cares what knockers think?
3. It doesn't add much to the TV rights deal.
Gee thanks for such an unbiased source...
The bears should have been told in 2006 to look interstate. They'd probably be in by now if they had
We're feeding info straight from the bid. They are hardly going to submit a wild figure without research, which they have done through a private PR firm.
If you prefer speculation from sources not connected to a bid team, visit the Brisbane2 site!
So what is the basis of this research?
5K to 8K is a lot of fans that most away Sydney teams rarely provide