What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Changes to the NRL Video Bunker in 2017

Messages
15,479
The following is from the NRL's website -

Changes to the NRL Bunker in 2017
Tue 07 Feb, 2017, 12:15pm
Media Release, NRL

The NRL Bunker will rule on point-scoring plays, in-goal restarts and reportable foul play only in the 2017 NRL Telstra Premiership.

Following an extensive review of the NRL Bunker’s operation in 2016, the video review system will no longer rule on knock-ons in general play or 40-20s.

NRL Head of Football Brian Canavan said overall the Bunker had been adjudged to be a significant step forward for the game in 2016.

"That said, we will continuously review the performance of the Bunker to ensure we keep improving. The review at the conclusion of the first season of the technology has led us to make some changes to the scope and operations of the system," Mr Canavan said.

"As we all become more accustomed to the incredible technology that we have at our disposal, we will always look to refine the system to ensure that the Bunker serves the fans, the Clubs and players in the best way possible.

"Prior to the 2016 season, we set out to deliver improved accuracy, efficiency, consistency and transparency from a video review perspective and we did so.

"We are extremely confident that we will deliver on those key pillars again."

The changes come after consultation with the NRL Coaches, the Competition Committee, as well as technical partners, broadcasters and fans. Experienced former head coach Ivan Cleary was also engaged in the process.

The changes will be in place for the first time in the Harvey Norman Rugby League All Stars match this Friday in Newcastle.

NRL General Manager Officiating Tony Archer said following its inaugural season, the NRL Bunker would continue to improve officiating in the game.

"A review of the Bunker after the first year identified that the most appropriate areas our reviewers should be involved in are point-scoring plays, in-goal restarts and reportable foul play," Mr Archer said.

"In all other aspects of officiating, the on-field officials will make the call."

Mr Archer said video review times in 2016 were down 17 per cent on the previous video referee system in 2015.

"The average video referral decision time was 64 seconds in 2016, and that figure was 55 seconds in the 2016 Finals Series.

Mr Archer added average referrals per game were also down on 2015 figures (3.53 per game in 2016 compared to 3.77 per game in 2015).

"Five errors out of 709 video referee referrals were recorded in 2016, which is a significant improvement on 2015," Mr Archer said.

"It is also worth noting that in 2015 we may not have even known if there was an error in all cases because we didn’t have the technology.

"Clearly we will always target zero errors but there will always be a human element to our decision-making.

"We also intend to refine our communication process to ensure fans have an almost instantaneous explanation of key decisions and evidence via social media."

The make-up of the video review teams will also be altered in 2017. The senior review official will be aided by one review official and a Hawkeye technician.

More about the NRL Bunker
 

Timmah

LeagueUnlimited News Editor
Staff member
Messages
100,986
Five errors would be in relation to actual decisions that defied the laws of the game to be made.

That's a lot different from ones where it comes down to decisions made on the current interpretation of the rules. Doesn't mean they were good decisions, but they weren't wrong according to the rules of the time.

I hope that makes sense.
 

Cockadoodledoo

First Grade
Messages
5,045
Five errors would be in relation to actual decisions that defied the laws of the game to be made.

That's a lot different from ones where it comes down to decisions made on the current interpretation of the rules. Doesn't mean they were good decisions, but they weren't wrong according to the rules of the time.

I hope that makes sense.

Give me a break.. When the Roosters had a potential match winning try against Manly for Latrell Mitchell being supposedly offside from a kick, Tony Archer came out the next day and backed the video refs decision. Later that week on Fox they used the technology they use on their broadcast for the soccer for offsides. It showed that he was onside by half a metre at least and at the time the kick was made. I call BS as Tony Archer has proven to be a liar time after time.
 

Cockadoodledoo

First Grade
Messages
5,045
The NRL listing their own internally marked stats for referee performance has about as much weight as those reports North Korea used to put out about Kim Jong il hitting an 18 shot round of golf

Exactly Tony 'Alternative Facts' Archer has no credibility whatsoever.
 

snickers007

Juniors
Messages
1,643
No video ref intervention on 40/20s and lost ball in general play is good news - however I have no faith that this stance will last past round 5 or 6.

All it will take is a tight game and an aggressive captain like James Graham to get in a refs face and they'll ask the video ref to get involved.



Also lol at '5 errors'. 5 errors per game perhaps, but definitely not 5 all season
 

T-Boon

Coach
Messages
15,862
I predict whatever they do the reaction will be "its worse than ever lets go back".
 

BestHookerRein

Juniors
Messages
393
Five errors would be in relation to actual decisions that defied the laws of the game to be made.

That's a lot different from ones where it comes down to decisions made on the current interpretation of the rules. Doesn't mean they were good decisions, but they weren't wrong according to the rules of the time.

I hope that makes sense.

There were literally at least 5 errors every round, but you believe what you want to believe.

It is unfortunate that the game is run by people more muppet than Kermit the Frog.
 

God-King Dean

Immortal
Messages
46,614
Five errors would be in relation to actual decisions that defied the laws of the game to be made.

That's a lot different from ones where it comes down to decisions made on the current interpretation of the rules. Doesn't mean they were good decisions, but they weren't wrong according to the rules of the time.

I hope that makes sense.

:joy:

Where's your pride ?
 

Latest posts

Top