simon says
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,124
I think there should be penalties for diving.
Archer is so soft.Too easy to snag a penalty.
Archer is so soft.Too easy to snag a penalty.
I think there should be penalties for diving.
Archer is so soft.Too easy to snag a penalty.
Semi finals and we are talking about this, FFS.
Hypothetical - there is 1 minute to go, you are trailing by four in the major semi. It's the 5th tackle. You cart the ball up, you get hit across the face, nothing malicious, but you are hit with a swinging arm.
Do you:
1 - Stay down even though you can get up, and get a penalty and another set of six?
2 - Get up and play the ball knowing that one more tackle and you are done and dusted for the season?
Anyone who chooses option two is f**king geniused.
Wake up and smell the coffee, FFS. It is not rocket science.
PS: If you get hit across the face, it is meant to be a penalty.
Why should the player NOT be penalised, just because the ref misses it? Get f**ked. You stay down and get the rightful penalty. Anyone who wouldn't is an imbecile and a complete liar.
It was as late as matai's on Emmys, except prince didn't try and take his head off.
You are niave if you think prince didn't know what he was doing. He is a smart player and saw a chance to rough up our star play maker. Most players would have taken it, but it is still a penalty
thats why its so bad. gets tackled, yelling at the ref pointing at carney. decides not to get up.
biggest dog.
Semi finals and we are talking about this, FFS.
Hypothetical - there is 1 minute to go, you are trailing by four in the major semi. It's the 5th tackle. You cart the ball up, you get hit across the face, nothing malicious, but you are hit with a swinging arm.
Do you:
1 - Stay down even though you can get up, and get a penalty and another set of six?
2 - Get up and play the ball knowing that one more tackle and you are done and dusted for the season?
Anyone who chooses option two is f**king geniused.
Wake up and smell the coffee, FFS. It is not rocket science.
PS: If you get hit across the face, it is meant to be a penalty.
Why should the player NOT be penalised, just because the ref misses it? Get f**ked. You stay down and get the rightful penalty. Anyone who wouldn't is an imbecile and a complete liar.
What prince did would have winded carney, getting hit late after a pass tends to mean you aren't braced for it, and has been a penalty all year (hark back to the roosters dogs game where JWH was penalized for tackling a bloke off the ball)
I think there should be penalties for diving.
Archer is so soft.Too easy to snag a penalty.
It's such a grey area though. There aren't many where you can say for sure that a player is faking. Even when everyone can see what's going on, a player can still argue that he was a bit dazed, winded or whatever if there's a suspension on the line.
Anasta's was pretty bad though, should be a contrary conduct charge but no chance of that happening
Ideally, it would be great if there was a code of honesty and a player's team mates were just as condemning as their opponents if they dive
This is not the time or the place for sensibility. Keep that stuff away from these message boards before they get an undeserved reputation!Everyone needs to get a grip on reality.
All players will stay down if it means some advantage in term of a penalty.
There was a furore over the soccer world cup but 'diving' is equally common place in the NRL and frankly I have no issue with it.
If you get hit accross the chops stay down and wait for the officials to have a look. All players in all clubs do it. It is a fact of life and we all need to accept that is the way it is.