Contains spoilers - Hasler

[gong_eagle]

I'm not the one expressing love for Menzies in my sig.

"we" as in all Manly fans, not "I" not me personally

its a shot a Crowe, if you havent realised

 

[t-ba]

Witty sees a man and the word 'love' and he's off on another planet. Even if that man happens to be the male form of Johanna Griggs.

 

[oneeyedeaglesman]

"we" as in all Manly fans, not "I" not me personally

its a shot a Crowe, if you havent realised

If you don't love BEAVER you are gay.:sarcasm:

 

[gong_eagle]

If you don't love BEAVER you are gay.:sarcasm:

has Wittyfan ever seen a beaver ? :lol:

 

[Jatz Crackers]

has Wittyfan ever seen a beaver ? :lol:

yes. Up close too. Thats why he now has just a mound where his penis used to be, which also explains his love of the ken doll.

 

[wittyfan]

This thread is going well!

 

[Jatz Crackers]

This thread is going well!

Your welcome ;-)

 

[gong_eagle]

This thread is going well!

yeah too bad your sick :sarcasm:

 

[wittyfan]

Sour grapes, gongy. Tut-tut.

 

[gong_eagle]

Sour grapes, gongy. Tut-tut.

I admitted earlier the better team won :crazy:

 

[wittyfan]

Stop moaning then about Witty, commentators, referees etc.

 

[byrne_rovelli_fan82]

You may be correct in that I did not see the game up until half time.

However, that No Try proved a real turning point, and I think Ward made an absolute meal of it with that decision.

And it was the object of your stalking obsession, Michael Witt, who had every chance to tackle the ball runner even after the decoy cut through him.

Instead he stood still and threw his hands up.

Should have been playing the whistle and not carrying on, as he had every attempt to make a tackle.

How about you go back and take a serious look at the way Burns was tackling? He was a shocker.

 

[gong_eagle]

Stop moaning then about Witty, commentators, referees etc.

sorry your opinion is the one we should all respect

 

[wittyfan]

Good thinking!

 

[byrne_rovelli_fan82]

As for the Robsterson No-try. Look, it was a close call, it could have gone either way, yes it did change the nature of the game, but that is football. You win some, you lose some.

Their first try came off two forward passes.

 

[Garts]

No it was not a 50/50 call, it was a definate try but I understand why they got wrong as these NRL officials a f**king geniused as we see week in and week out so I am not surprised. Same goes for Hicks try of the forward pass.

 

[lockyno1]

Better team won..and stop bagging witty as he did more than that moron Burns did anyway!