What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Cowboys v Roosters

super_coach

First Grade
Messages
5,061
Razor said:
. Minichello tackles a Cowboy without the ball from the kickoff

Couldn't have been a penalty. There was a double-knock on. The only way to get a penalty after that is for a piece of foul play or referee abuse. The rules don't allow for a penalty in that instance.

He should have called time off when the cowboys were set up for the scrum in the last few seconds

The scrum wasn't set. There were only 5 players in the scrum. The 6th got in just at the 80th minute when the siren went

You're ignoring the point that it should have been a penalty for offside. I have no idea how Simpkins could've missed that
 

t-ba

Post Whore
Messages
59,617
Really Sucks. The two darlings of the NRL referees association in the GF :roll:
 

CycloneSteve

Juniors
Messages
2,125
No Razor any penalty overides a double knock on. Its a major breach over a minor breach. Should have been penalty Cowboys.
 

Razor

Coach
Messages
10,077
eastsrule said:
Isn't tackling a player without the ball a piece of Foul Play, Razor?

No it's just an infringment. Foul play is punching, kicking, elbowing a player. If the Cowboys player picked up the ball it still would have been a scrum, as it was a double-knock on, not just a Roosters knock-on. So taking out the Cowboy gave the Roosters no advantage, so it's first infringment first. The rules are clear on the subject.
 

Dragon

Coach
Messages
14,977
BOYCOTT!

Dont buy a the Telegraph, dont watch the footy show, and most of all come Sunday night, switch on a movie, go out for dinner, do something other than watch the 2004 GF
 

mickdo

Coach
Messages
17,355
Razor said:
. Minichello tackles a Cowboy without the ball from the kickoff

Couldn't have been a penalty. There was a double-knock on. The only way to get a penalty after that is for a piece of foul play or referee abuse. The rules don't allow for a penalty in that instance.
Rubbish. The cowboys didnt even touch the ball until after Minichello had taken his head nearly off before the ball got there.
 
Messages
13,876
Minicheillo knocked on, walker then touched it he was offside should have been a penalty not a scrum, just another Simpkins mistake.
 

Razor

Coach
Messages
10,077
mickdo said:
Razor said:
. Minichello tackles a Cowboy without the ball from the kickoff

Couldn't have been a penalty. There was a double-knock on. The only way to get a penalty after that is for a piece of foul play or referee abuse. The rules don't allow for a penalty in that instance.
Rubbish. The cowboys didnt even touch the ball until after Minichello had taken his head nearly off before the ball got there.

I suggest you watch it again. The referee called double-knock on before MiniC tackled the Cowboy. The Cowboy touched the ball before that.
 

Dr Crane

Live Update Team
Messages
19,531
BOYCOTT!

Dont buy a the Telegraph, dont watch the footy show, and most of all come Sunday night, switch on a movie, go out for dinner, do something other than watch the 2004 GF

:roll: :roll: :roll:
 

eastsrule

Bench
Messages
4,301
Razor said:
eastsrule said:
Isn't tackling a player without the ball a piece of Foul Play, Razor?

No it's just an infringment. Foul play is punching, kicking, elbowing a player. If the Cowboys player picked up the ball it still would have been a scrum, as it was a double-knock on, not just a Roosters knock-on. So taking out the Cowboy gave the Roosters no advantage, so it's first infringment first. The rules are clear on the subject.

Minichello clearly attacked the players head with no intent on going for the ball. That is foul play.
 

^ Pando

retired
Messages
7,121
Dragon said:
BOYCOTT!

Dont buy a the Telegraph, dont watch the footy show, and most of all come Sunday night, switch on a movie, go out for dinner, do something other than watch the 2004 GF

I doubt it!! :lol:
 

CycloneSteve

Juniors
Messages
2,125
Who cares about the foul play. It should have been a penalty to the cowboys after Mini lost it forward and a player from his own team who was in front, picked it up.
 

mickdo

Coach
Messages
17,355
Razor said:
mickdo said:
Razor said:
. Minichello tackles a Cowboy without the ball from the kickoff

Couldn't have been a penalty. There was a double-knock on. The only way to get a penalty after that is for a piece of foul play or referee abuse. The rules don't allow for a penalty in that instance.
Rubbish. The cowboys didnt even touch the ball until after Minichello had taken his head nearly off before the ball got there.

I suggest you watch it again. The referee called double-knock on before MiniC tackled the Cowboy. The Cowboy touched the ball before that.
Another mistake by Simpkins... :roll:
 

Latest posts

Top