Feel free you cop apologists. If you sleep at night because the turds are there to protect you, you're as deluded as Sheens and soufs fans who think they can win the comp. Cops are there to protect themselves and about as impartial as Hartley doing a Canterbury game.
From today's paper
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/adam-salt...ice-shooting-inquiry-told-20120827-24veh.html
It is looking promising that this corrupt organisation is going to be held to account
and pulled up for attempting a cover up. However, the fact that an ambulance officer
can speak out against the police without fear of retribution is an improvement over
15 years ago. On the other hand they may just have thought they got away with it.
I had a chat to a couple of coppers a few weeks ago (just pulled them up off the
street, explained I was interested in what they knew about tasers) and they told
me they were trained to hit the largest body mass, same as with a gun. The bloke
loosened up after a bit, and explained that in fact you were "encouraged" to shoot
people in the back with a taser (I had been quizzing them on where they were told
to shoot people). He advised me to confirm that with a weapons officer.
It would certainly appear that this goat has shot him with a gun accidentally (instead
of a taser) and the cops have tried to cover it up.
I haven't heard anything in the public domain about being encouraged to shoot
people in the back with a taser (it doesn't make any sense from an electrical safety
point of view as far as I can see).
