What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Cronulla Sharks slam NRL over poor handling of women’s com

RUBIKS

Juniors
Messages
1,280
VRaQBW3.png


.
 
Messages
15,206
Bump, just for a change of scenery to all the shite that has been going on.
Remember when both The Sharks and South's said that the model for the Women's Comp the NRL were proposing wouldn't work????
Well surprise, surprise the "inaugural " WNRL clubs have just woken up.....

Clubs reveal cost of running team in NRLW competition
MARCH 26, 2019The NRL women’s competition is costing participating clubs a whopping combined total of $1.5 million a season — and they want urgent financial help.

The Sydney Roosters, St George Illawarra, New Zealand Warriors and Brisbane Broncos have held private phone hook-ups to discuss the financial drain of the four-week competition, which runs through September.

A source said they even spoke about withdrawing from the competition but felt it would be “embarrassing” for the game. The four clubs remain committed — for now.

Each club is outlaying between $300,000 to $400,000 a year to field a team — without any financial assistance. Brisbane are the only side that can comfortably absorb that cost.

Player and coach payments, as well as a $50,000 entry fee, are among the costs.

6cd826f068270e62ce4ef38fc4540eaf

Elianna Walton charges into the Dragons defence last year. Picture: Getty Images
The NRL pays costs — including staff, administration, travel and accommodation — but doesn’t provide any additional funds for women’s teams above the $13 million grant it gives all clubs.

That could change once the next broadcast deal is secured.

Currently, the NRL gives all clubs a $13m annual grant with no additional funds. The AFL is understood to pay each club fielding a women’s side $250,000 a season.

The NRL said each club was aware of the costs involved — including the entry fee — when asking to be included in the competition two years ago.

The women’s rugby league competition was deemed a success last year because of solid crowds and ratings. But the financial drain on clubs has caused some angst.

“All administrative costs of running the women’s premiership are picked up by the NRL, while participating clubs are responsible for their own team-related costs, as is the case with the NRL men’s competition,” Tiffany Slater, NRL general manager of women’s elite program, said.

ef076d23e8d2464dffa286376d56e9ab

Stephanie Hancock and Heather Ballinger got their hands on the inaugural NRLW Trophy after the Broncos defeated the Roosters in the grand final. Picture; Getty Images
“Clubs entered into the competition voluntarily under the terms and conditions offered last year, and we had several disappointed clubs who missed out on an initial licence despite their keenness to be included as a foundation club.”

The NRL, which will meet later this year to review the competition, with expansion a possibility, states each club could reduce expenditure if needed and that costs are “within the clubs’ control.”

Some clubs, according to the NRL, did not apply for entry into the competition due to the anticipated costs. Others applied and missed out on a licence.

Minimal sponsorship for the competition — which has only run for one year — does help alleviate some of costs. There have been suggestions that players want a small increase in payments — a request that will be rejected.

The Broncos, Warriors, Roosters and Dragons had hoped the NRL would offer grants to cover some of the costs. One official close to the clubs: “Surely the NRL can find $1m and give each club a couple of hundred thousand.”

a22a5f6489e1bb18d9932379c2beba70

Tazmin Gray struggles to break free of the Dragons’ defence. Picture: AAP
It is understood some major sponsors of the NRL have insisted on having a women’s competition. The clubs feel they are now “subsiding” NRL sponsorship.

NRL officials remain committed to the women’s competition. Clubs were reluctant to comment because the issue was deemed too politically sensitive.

The 12 clubs which do not field sides may object to the NRL outlaying additional money for clubs with a women’s side. There is a fear that expanding the competition may expose a lack of depth among women’s rugby league.

“The NRL women’s competition is a critical component in the ongoing development of rugby league,” Slater said. “The NRL has a commitment to not only increasing female participation, but also broadening the appeal of our game to more women.

“Expansion of the competition for 2020 and beyond will be considered later this year based on a detailed assessment of the development of playing talent, enhancement of the quality of the competition, and long-term financial sustainability.”

The NRL employ staff to run the women’s competition. A women’s State of Origin game will be played as a stand-alone event on June 21 at North Sydney Oval.

https://outline.com/SBUaea
 
Messages
15,477
And this mob want us to trust them in regards to making good decisions with expanding the game.

Please.

One of the drop kicks thought Laurie Nicholls was still alive.

NFI

No wonder the Sharks and Rabbits didn’t agree with the financial model of the women’s game. Those costs for a four team Comp are ridiculous.
 

Generalzod

Immortal
Messages
33,904
f**k me . A comp consisting of only four f**king teams is not competition. It is a f**king joke.

But when it comes to jokes, Toddy and Pete and the NRL never cease to not make me laugh and laugh and laugh.
We can watch the Storm play Brisbane every second week how fun will that be
 

Quigs

Immortal
Messages
34,835
Why do they all look like Rayleen Castle?
Annnnd ......... What ......... is .......... wrong ........ with ......... that ?

I am right into Black Lipstick and Black Nail Polish.

That of course, is that the black is correct grade of black.
 

sandshark

Bench
Messages
3,694
This is hilariously bad. Never change, Turdbag. What a joke of a governing board we have. Absolute farce.
 

RandyAndy

Juniors
Messages
57
4 weeks, $1.5 million.

Hahaha

four teams of 17 players = 68 add coach, trainer, physio for each team = 3 x 4 = 12

1,500,000 / 68 = $22,060 or 1,500,000 / 80 = $18,750 for each player and it is probably even less than that considering.the women would probably have higher health insurance premiums to pay and then pay tax on that income and which probably includes super too, so roughly their income could come down to potentially less than $10k after additional costs.

I read also that sponsors like to get them involved with lunches and events, and they probably dont get paid to attend those events representing the nrl/signed club. so that would also eat into the hourly work rate and makes me think back to my apprenticeship days
 

Eion

First Grade
Messages
8,033
Didn’t the sharks have a $200k sponsor lined up for the women’s comp? Maybe we should just focus on this and wrap the men up.
 

Latest posts

Top