kia ora storm said::blahb: ...thanks for the lecture...must remember to consult your wisdom next time I post.
You obviously hold grudges on past posts...:roll:
Iafeta said:It's wrong is it?
You're the bloke going around telling everyone Johnson shouldn't have been charged because he didn't have intent, I merely showed you that it has nothing to do with intent. That's another grading altogether, so that can't have had anything to do with the final decision as grading wasn't put into the initial charge. Surely you can understand that, or do I need to break it down further for you?