macavity
Referee
- Messages
- 20,685
Was our run of decent form early this year the exception rather than the rule?
Our move from laughing stock in 07 to respectable in 08 to "dark horses" in early 09 was credited almost exclusively to Smith.
In reforming our team, Smith has cut the locals (fair enough) and imported a bunch of fringe players (probably justified given where we were).
It would seem juniors have been almost completely ignored in this revolution.
There is some great individual talent coming up in SG Ball and Harold Matthews - but they are 3-5 years off NRL, if they make it. Our NYC team is running what, 15th? There are some promising talents there too - but aside from Mata'utia, none look anywhere near FG ready - hell most of the better prospects have a few years of NYC left.
It would appear to me that Dogs 09 aside (who had the best recruitment of any team ever, facilitated by massively front-ending contracts to 08), success is generally built on developing talent - not picking up everyone else's castoffs.
We haven't focussed on developing talent. Instead we have bought in a whole heap of fringe FGers - who almost to a man are very reliant on Smith for their tactics, motivation, confidence. I wouldn't be surprised if he wipes their butts too.
The difference in focus and confidence since Smithy's "announcement" is stark.
He is gone in 6 weeks. The way we are playing, we might not win another game in that time.
What do we do then?
Can our rag tag bunch of rejects, misfits and overpaid fat blokes aim up without him?
It would seem they are shell shocked as is - and he is still here.
We haven't recruited even one player for next year. We will lose a few, including probably our best outside back (Doogs) and possibly Simmo too (looking very old).
Ostensibly we are banking on some big improvements in the squad we have. Without their guru, will they improve at all?
As an extension of this, is Rick Stone, the guy already here, the guy who says he is the right man for the job because he "believes in Smith's systems".... is he our guy?
Do Smith's systems work without Smith?
Hell, will this team work without him?
Because they seem to have shat themselves at the prospect of him not being here, let alone come the time he isn't here.
Unless we screw our heads back on, this season is gone, and unless we make some sound decisions, '10 might be a train wreck.
I don't know what that decision needs to be - do we need a change, or is this just a blip on an upward trajectory?
is the current downturn a blip, or was the previous promising form a dead cat bounce?
Our move from laughing stock in 07 to respectable in 08 to "dark horses" in early 09 was credited almost exclusively to Smith.
In reforming our team, Smith has cut the locals (fair enough) and imported a bunch of fringe players (probably justified given where we were).
It would seem juniors have been almost completely ignored in this revolution.
There is some great individual talent coming up in SG Ball and Harold Matthews - but they are 3-5 years off NRL, if they make it. Our NYC team is running what, 15th? There are some promising talents there too - but aside from Mata'utia, none look anywhere near FG ready - hell most of the better prospects have a few years of NYC left.
It would appear to me that Dogs 09 aside (who had the best recruitment of any team ever, facilitated by massively front-ending contracts to 08), success is generally built on developing talent - not picking up everyone else's castoffs.
We haven't focussed on developing talent. Instead we have bought in a whole heap of fringe FGers - who almost to a man are very reliant on Smith for their tactics, motivation, confidence. I wouldn't be surprised if he wipes their butts too.
The difference in focus and confidence since Smithy's "announcement" is stark.
He is gone in 6 weeks. The way we are playing, we might not win another game in that time.
What do we do then?
Can our rag tag bunch of rejects, misfits and overpaid fat blokes aim up without him?
It would seem they are shell shocked as is - and he is still here.
We haven't recruited even one player for next year. We will lose a few, including probably our best outside back (Doogs) and possibly Simmo too (looking very old).
Ostensibly we are banking on some big improvements in the squad we have. Without their guru, will they improve at all?
As an extension of this, is Rick Stone, the guy already here, the guy who says he is the right man for the job because he "believes in Smith's systems".... is he our guy?
Do Smith's systems work without Smith?
Hell, will this team work without him?
Because they seem to have shat themselves at the prospect of him not being here, let alone come the time he isn't here.
Unless we screw our heads back on, this season is gone, and unless we make some sound decisions, '10 might be a train wreck.
I don't know what that decision needs to be - do we need a change, or is this just a blip on an upward trajectory?
is the current downturn a blip, or was the previous promising form a dead cat bounce?