Delete!

[Ronnie Dobbs]

I thought I read that he predicted a 58-12 win to the Broncos this week.

Must be talking about the Denver Broncos.

 

[matrightyeh]

wow not bad would luv if it was me

 

[carlosthedwarf]

Must be talking about the Denver Broncos.

Not after how they played on Monday.

 

[big_matt]

Not after how they played on Monday.

Denver will be lucky to get 58 points for the season. That was woeful.

 

[nqcowboy87]

go pats

 

[Apey]

This thread is LU's Nutbag central...

:lol: is anyone really surprised LU is home to a few conspiracy theorists?

 

[hillbillyjazzer1954]

Does it mean something that Wests won their 9th game in a row on the 9th of the 9th by 9 points? Any budding numerologists or associated freaks out there care to comment :crazy:

Nein!!!!

 

[bobmar28]

Broncos and Warriors to win.

 

[bileduct]

lol yet there is footage from 55 other cameras the govt refuse to release.

Prove it.

 

[bileduct]

Are you actually serious??

He is serious.

As someone who fell into this crowd for a few years before waking up to myself (2004-2006) I can tell you that these clowns believe that they have a superior understanding of global politics that allows them, and only them, to see the truth.

 

[bileduct]

please don't try to argue with your factual evidence..

He didn't, so no reason to worry.

Unless, of course, you think opinions are facts.

 

[Hutty1986]

He is serious.

As someone who fell into this crowd for a few years before waking up to myself (2004-2006) I can tell you that these clowns believe that they have a superior understanding of global politics that allows them, and only them, to see the truth.

Wow... some nutters out there!!

 

[bileduct]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=auQX6KQ2lBU

These 700 architects and engineers seem to disagree. damm hippies

I am not even going to bother looking at this, but I assume it's a bunch of idiots like Richard Gage who thinks that dropping a cardboard box on another cardboard box somehow proves the WTC collapse is impossible, or Steven Jones who paid to have his theories of nano-thermite published in a supposedly peer reviewed journal (causing the editor to later resign) - nano-thermite recovered from dust samples that was only plentiful enough for Jones to suggest it was used as a trigger for another explosive... despite the complete absence of any other traces of explosives in the same dust. Or was it Judy Wood who believes that space beams disintegrated the twin towers and has issues determining the difference between dust and smoke?

I always enjoy these lists of persons who supposedly believe that 9/11 was an inside job. Funny how many names are removed from them over time... remember Van Jones?

Truthers make me laugh.

 

[bileduct]

As for the opinions of "experts", if I trusted every "expert" that I listened to then I would probably start saying "China launched a two stage ICBM off the coast of California" like all of you f**kin Alex Jones parrots.

 

[YEHHHBOYYYD]

lol bileduct..

If it's not your opinion, it's wrong..

I get it.

 

[nqcowboy87]

:crazy::crazy::crazy:

 

[Hutty1986]

lol bileduct..

If it's not your opinion, it's wrong..

I get it.

But this is an example where he's right. Any f*cking low-life merkin saying 9/11 was somehow a big govt. conspiracy are a disgrace & it's f*cking insullting to the victims of the tragedy

 

[Everlovin' Antichrist]

I am not even going to bother looking at this, but I assume it's a bunch of idiots like Richard Gage who thinks that dropping a cardboard box on another cardboard box somehow proves the WTC collapse is impossible, or Steven Jones who paid to have his theories of nano-thermite published in a supposedly peer reviewed journal (causing the editor to later resign) - nano-thermite recovered from dust samples that was only plentiful enough for Jones to suggest it was used as a trigger for another explosive... despite the complete absence of any other traces of explosives in the same dust. Or was it Judy Wood who believes that space beams disintegrated the twin towers and has issues determining the difference between dust and smoke?

I always enjoy these lists of persons who supposedly believe that 9/11 was an inside job. Funny how many names are removed from them over time... remember Van Jones?

Truthers make me laugh.

If I had any idea what that post meant, I'd top myself.

 

[age.s]

But this is an example where he's right. Any f*cking low-life merkin saying 9/11 was somehow a big govt. conspiracy are a disgrace & it's f*cking insullting to the victims of the tragedy

Whether or not 9/11 was an inside job or even if the "truthers" are complete nut jobs that's the most geniused line of reasoning for not having a debate about something, particularly given it's 10 years after the event. Quite aside from the fact most of the "victims" are not of this world anymore and therefore likely immune to the insults of mortals, if I lost a loved one in the attacks I would want every possible avenue pursued regarding how this event actually happened. Being used as a proxy to stifle debate is what I would find insulting quite frankly.

 

[Hutty1986]

Whether or not 9/11 was an inside job or even if the "truthers" are complete nut jobs that's the most geniused line of reasoning for not having a debate about something, particularly given it's 10 years after the event. Quite aside from the fact most of the "victims" are not of this world anymore and therefore likely immune to the insults of mortals, if I lost a loved one in the attacks I would want every possible avenue pursued regarding how this event actually happened. Being used as a proxy to stifle debate is what I would find insulting quite frankly.

You're only debating it because you have your tinfoil hat on