What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Delete!

Nice Beaver

First Grade
Messages
5,920
flight77-10.jpg


but don't let the facts get in the way of what you're suppose to believe

hahahaha don't talk about facts when you want to show one little pic that does not show the true size of that wall the plane hit Einstein.
The wall's length that the plane hit was approx 282 metres in length. The width of the place that hit the building (a Being 757) is 38 metres.
When you look at the scale of the wall and plane the size is actually correct.
But don't let the facts get in the way of what you're "suppose" to believe from the conspiracy theorists.
Guess what people, sometimes nasty people do nasty shit to other people. And sometimes natural distasters kill people. As terrible as it all is there's no big boogy man organisation behind it. Good grief.
Go read this http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1
 
Last edited:

bileduct

Coach
Messages
17,832
the wings and tail obviously had a folding mechanism which allowed the wings to fold over the middle of the plane, right?
Do you actually understand anything at all about aircraft crashes or do you just play the role of an "expert" on internet forums?
 

simmo1

First Grade
Messages
5,576
Pretty sad when the number of conspiracy theorist nutjobs appears to outnumber the normal people...
 

Jason Maher

Immortal
Messages
35,991
Umm... the wings sheared off on impact with the reinforced concrete facade.

N.b. most truthers disavow the "it wasn't a plane that hit the Pentagon" theory. A lot of them believe the ide is a deliberate government plant designed to discredit them (as if they don't do a good enough job of it on their own).

My personal favourite is the relatively recent "nano-thermite" theory. I mean, who could have predicted particles of iron oxide and aluminium would be found among the debris of a steel-framed building with significant aluminium sub-structures hit by an aluminium jet?
 
Last edited:

bileduct

Coach
Messages
17,832
Umm... the wings sheared off on impact with the reinforced concrete facade.
One of the wings was also partially destroyed before impact with the wall when it sheered the top off an electricity generator and mobile habitation.
N.b. most truthers disavow the "it wasn't a plane that hit the Pentagon" theory. A lot of them believe the ide is a deliberate government plant designed to discredit them (as if they don't do a good enough job of it on their own).
I can understand the LIHOPers but the MIHOPers are absolute whack jobs.
My personal favourite is the relatively recent "nano-thermite" theory. I mean, who could have predicted particles of iron oxide and aluminium would be found among the debris of a steel-framed building with significant aluminium sub-structures hit by an aluminium jet?
I remember Steven Jones later saying that the nano-thermite was used as a trigger for some other type of unknown explosive that was strangely absent from the same dust samples.
 

blaza88z

Coach
Messages
15,188
do any of you halfwits think I care enough about this subject to go into depths as to why I think it's a conspiracy, I watched a documentary on youtube and found the arguments interesting enough for me to believe there is doubt there that it couldn't have all been terrorists with box cutters

the towers going down just looks liked a controlled demolition, no i'm no expert on the matter but I think I read somewhere that those were the only buildings to come down after an inferno

I posted the picture with the plane because I trust the judgement of whoever did it, you'd think that they would know enough about the aircraft in comparison to the hole in the wall if they go to the troubles of making an hour long documentary on it, it's interesting viewing for someone like me who has absolutely no emotional connection with anything that happened on 9 11, I also posted the picture because the killer instinct within me wanted to see how many people take a bite

keep it real homies
 

bileduct

Coach
Messages
17,832
do any of you halfwits think I care enough about this subject to go into depths as to why I think it's a conspiracy
No, and I know you can't anyway because you're simply a believer. Believe what you're told.

the towers going down just looks liked a controlled demolition, no i'm no expert on the matter but I think I read somewhere that those were the only buildings to come down after an inferno
I love the argument that no other skyscraper that has caught fire has ever collapsed like WTC1 and WTC2 did. It completely ignores the fact that none of those other buildings were hit by a f**king commercial airliner at 500MPH, damaging the support structure.

I posted the picture with the plane because I trust the judgement of whoever did it
You trust someone that you can't even name.

you'd think that they would know enough about the aircraft in comparison to the hole in the wall if they go to the troubles of making an hour long documentary on it
Are you aware that Loose Change was originally FICTION (still is, really) until Dylan Avery realised he could make money off it because people believed that shit?

I also posted the picture because the killer instinct within me wanted to see how many people take a bite
Killer instinct... Laugh out f**king loud... You couldn't even kill a ham sandwich.
 
Top