I've had some time to process everything - Vic's post above really put things into perspective a bit which makes me feel less hopeless. Thinking everything through, I think I know what the problem is.
Simply put, the problem is Luke Brooks.
This is the first time I've ever bagged him. I've always been a supporter of him and made a million excuses for him, but today there are none.
- Our forwards performed well and marched us up the field, laying down a strong platform for a halfback to work off
- He was given free reign to call the shots and play on both sides of the field
- Liddle was feeding him the ball whenever he asked for it e.g. no Robbie Farah style dummy half playmaking
Yes, players like BJ, Garner and even Kepoa did not help, but think of it this way: if you replaced BJ with Chris Lawrence in his prime, or Garner with Gareth Ellis, or Kepoa with JAC...we still would have lost. However, if you swapped Luke Brooks for Scott Prince (in his prime) we probably would have won that game. Game management is all about building pressure. The only pressure Brooks built was towards ourselves, which caused dumbasses like BJ to make stupid decisions, poor defenders like Garner to become exposed, and inexperienced rookies like Kepoa to make mistakes.
My fear is that we can shuffle the deck chairs as much as we want, but until we have a game managing halfback we will continue to have the same issues.